Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:pa5mw@home.nl: 68 ]

Total 68 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Load testing a 50 amp supply? (score: 1)
Author: "M. van Wijk" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:57:29 +0100
Any ideas on what I could use to load it up for a test? Yes: use car headlights in paralell as load. They handle 12-14V easy and have a capacity between 55 and 110W each, depending on the type. '73 M
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00436.html (8,978 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] For those who prefer even a bigger 'Sea view in color TFT' : ICOM IC-7800 (score: 1)
Author: pa5mw@home.nl (M. van Wijk)
Date: Sun May 18 10:19:54 2003
Just received this link on the new coming ICOM IC-7800 HF/50Mhz rig: http://qtc-japan.net/2001/03_news&topics/ic-7800new.pdf '73 Mark, PA5MW
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00177.html (6,543 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] DXpedition/Portable Radio Recommendations? (score: 1)
Author: pa5mw@home.nl (M. van Wijk)
Date: Mon Jul 29 22:52:07 2002
. It is rapidly becoming the rig of choice for I will second that! '73 Mark, PA5MW K2 #2036 (& FT1000MP + Inrad mods, filters etc.....)
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00585.html (7,101 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] If you were buying a new contest radio today... (score: 1)
Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 10:43:31 +0200
Ten-Tec ORION Without a blink of an eye. Have tried this rig for 2 yrs now, both at home and in heavy contest situations (PI4TUE , with ALL antennas raised above 220ft AGL). Have had several differen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00117.html (10,799 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] If you were buying a new contest radio today... (score: 1)
Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 01:39:46 +0200
Hello Jukka, I was tipped on the Orion by Rein, PA0R who uses it for 3 years now. Mine never had any trouble; not during 48hrs contesting, nor when it was kept switched on for several weeks in a row
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00126.html (10,835 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 07:20:13 -0500
Boy , do us europeans always have such difficulties with such simple plain FACTS.... We are talking about a "game within a hobby" for crying out loud. If you don't like the rules discuss them with th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00004.html (7,936 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] This is Logic? (score: 1)
Author: <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:04:22 -0500
So very much agree with all below. The unassisted category (The Last of the Mohanicans) is held hostage by those just wanting to debate the term "unassisted". By littering the 'redefine the rules' de
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00298.html (12,793 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Top Ten scores & 3830 postings? (score: 1)
Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 07:18:02 +0200
Very much agree here. The 3830 list is voluntary and has no offical means. Due to general mistrust it now should be regarded as bad behaviour if you do not upload your score within xx hours ? Bad ide
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00295.html (8,807 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx ssb spotting report...Untill then........... (score: 1)
Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:23:33 +0100
Unless there will be much more proven operating practise involved in passing the exam.... Unless more elmers step up to help teaching new ops...... Unless us Europeans will start acting according the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00253.html (12,866 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut number "J" (score: 1)
Author: pa5mw@home.nl
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:02:59 +0100
100W That is the most common known LP limit in Europe. As is 4TT (400) the HP limit for many. 73 and have fun! Mark, PA5MW @PI4TUE _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00228.html (8,209 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] RX Heresy? (score: 1)
Author: pa5mw@home.nl
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:06:41 +0100
Hi Pete, Our club station has moved from back end to sub top-ten position this year. Since that is also due to some hardware changes I'd like to share our experiences during these last few years. Har
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00387.html (12,546 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 12:48:10 +0100
Hans, You're stretching it to the point of ridiculous. Please stick to the "boy and his hobby" as you've always greatly mastered in the past. 73, Mark PA5MW __________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00366.html (9,954 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:08:31 +0100
In my personal opinion yes that's fair. Next, since it is a different country with a different administration and possible hamradio rules, you need to get a new different callsign anyway. I do not un
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00035.html (9,210 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get? (score: 1)
Author: Mark van Wijk <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:49:35 +0200
Tom's statement below can be verfied by listening to the NCDXF HF Beacons; 10dB does not make a difference. At noise level or in the crud, if you can just hear their 100W carrier, you can still hear
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00206.html (10,700 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Duelling as a honourable "fair game" (score: 1)
Author: Mark van Wijk <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:49:07 +0200
We already have such a thing, right? Just participate at www.getscores.org. 73, Mark, PA5MW/member of PI4TUE Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00240.html (7,582 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL language on what is "assisted" (score: 1)
Author: Mark van Wijk <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:23:39 +0200
I agree with you Dave. As long as it doesn't need to go as far as to (re-)educate plain human morality. That being the main culprit in our hobby, every day that is. 73 Mark, PA5MW ___________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00329.html (8,675 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] Antw:Re: Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: "M. WIJK" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:41:44 +0200
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00141.html (6,566 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] Antw: Re: This weekend PACC contest (score: 1)
Author: "M. WIJK" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 14:31:14 +0100
Hi Brian, Check the PACC results website at: http://pacc.veron.nl/results.html Then select from the top-right corner, under Previous Years , PACC 2012, Wordwide by country /by category 73 Mark, PA5MW
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00224.html (9,695 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] This weekend PACC contest (score: 1)
Author: "PA5MW, Mark" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:29:13 +0100
Just another hint: The link tables are not shown, until you scroll down, a lot. But only if your browser screen is too small. We will need to change that. After the contest that is. For now, have fun
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00233.html (7,358 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] Antw: Re: Remote contest operation (score: 1)
Author: "M. WIJK" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:24:08 +0200
Paul , I could not have put this any better. Having followed your many messages on this subject, I believe (and hope) that most readers must have understood your message by now. I dislike doing a 'me
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00279.html (18,214 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu