| To: | David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL language on what is "assisted" |
| From: | Mark van Wijk <pa5mw@home.nl> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:23:39 +0200 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I agree with you Dave. As long as it doesn't need to go as far as to (re-)educate plain human morality. That being the main culprit in our hobby, every day that is. 73 Mark, PA5MW On 24 okt. 2011, at 19:59, David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com> wrote: > > Too many times the rules are written as if they already assume > the reader knows what the intent was. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL language on what is "assisted", Dick Green WC1M |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] inhale, spots, skimmer, etc: WHAT'S THE POINT?, kr2q |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL language on what is "assisted", Dick Green WC1M |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] The real problem, Tom W8JI |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |