Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:pa5mw@home.nl: 68 ]

Total 68 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote contest operation (score: 1)
Author: "M. WIJK" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:13:39 +0200
I'm sure the next X-box/Wii- HAM Radio game version-upgrade will have a "virtual remote servicing option" , including your arctic grade lube :) Seriously, If you enter the game of contesting, please
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00280.html (10,978 bytes)

22. [CQ-Contest] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Remote contest operation (score: 1)
Author: "M. WIJK" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:02:42 +0200
Hi Gerry, I have great respect for any serious remote station setup. In fact, I do own one together with a friend. However, during a contest I expect the operator to be physically on site. Take the b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00283.html (26,315 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote contest operation (score: 1)
Author: "PA5MW, Mark" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:21:34 +0200
On 15-4-2013 17:12, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote: I guess I'm surprised by this attitude. Being surprised about reactions here, and wanting to know if I too am loneley voicing an off-centre opinion, I quick
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00300.html (14,196 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Remote contest operation (score: 1)
Author: "M. WIJK" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:37:51 +0200
Better leave that home. And my apologies if my expression affects you in any way. I have absolutely no reason to undermine your expertise and respectable work. I just think differently about the radi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00304.html (18,174 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1)
Author: "PA5MW, Mark" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:49:50 +0200
Interesting information, I never knew that. I understand that such technologies find their way in practical daily situations. Do not see what Norddeich Radio has to do with HamRadio Contesting. In my
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00237.html (9,629 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1)
Author: "PA5MW, Mark" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:59:36 +0200
Sorry Tom, But 'the opponents' are not amused by being accused of being jealous or anything like that. Again, for the record; I very much respect all the work and effort done for enabling a remote HF
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00239.html (9,101 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1)
Author: "PA5MW, Mark" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:23:00 +0200
Hi Felipe, Good idea! 73 Mark, PA5MW At minimum, instead of removing the extreme categories, a remote category or at least an overlay should be added. 73's and flame on! Felipe NP4Z _________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00273.html (8,495 bytes)

28. [CQ-Contest] Antw: Re: ARRL fieldday reports at RBN (reversed beacon network) (score: 1)
Author: "M. WIJK" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:19:28 +0200
To support Peter's statement on s/n differences due to different antennas to the receiver and local noise, I can add the following: Local background noise can matter, a lot. A friend of mine recently
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00309.html (10,751 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Understanding the dynamic error free RBN algorithm (score: 1)
Author: "PA5MW, Mark" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 12:59:13 +0200
Human now making excuses for failure of machine to do better than humans are capable of... -ex-VR2BG/p. So, now we're past the intro of RBN (great invention!), let's also move forward to achieve the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00205.html (8,921 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Foot switches ? (score: 1)
Author: "PA5MW, Mark" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 16:08:01 +0200
Try the 3$ PA5RWE (SK) 8" home made version. For 10 years already in use at our PI4TUE club-station and at home. Reliable usage with either large boots or only tip-toeing. See self explaining picks a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-08/msg00142.html (9,417 bytes)

31. [CQ-Contest] What rig to choose for a one-time fieldday MM setup? (score: 1)
Author: "PA5MW, Mark" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:03:00 +0100
Looking for the ideal HF rig for a one-time 6 band field-day MM setup. Run+mult stations, so about 12 HF rigs in total. All 160-10m stations using the same rig. All with external filtering. All with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00437.html (8,291 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] What rig to choose for a one-time fieldday MM setup? (score: 1)
Author: "PA5MW, Mark" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 21:23:55 +0100
Thanks for all your responses. But please mind you: - We need to allocate no less than *10-12* similar HF rigs - The K3 is way too high priced 73 Mark, PA5MW On 29-11-2013 14:03, PA5MW, Mark wrote: L
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00472.html (10,198 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] What rig to choose for a one-time fieldday MM setup? (score: 1)
Author: "PA5MW, Mark" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:20:35 +0100
Hello Maarten, Thanks for your reply. The TS480 indeed is a very good rig. It would need the (hard to get) additional 11-12pcs CW filters, without that it cannot be used in a CW contest. About the IC
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00495.html (10,633 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] What rig to choose for a one-time fieldday MM setup? (score: 1)
Author: "PA5MW, Mark" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 11:25:41 +0100
Exactly! Thank you Chet. Based on real live experience feedback here and to my personal mail: 1) K3 2) TS590 3) TT Eagle That seems about the list to choose from. All three have pos and very few neg
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00002.html (7,973 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: [PPRAANet] CQ Magazine (score: 1)
Author: "PA5MW, Mark" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:07:30 +0100
**An aside: Slowly, marketplace realities are beginning to penetrate the publishing industry, including advertisers, as experience replaces hype. Even young people prefer print over digital for certa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00175.html (8,206 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why I ignore "NA EU" etc (score: 1)
Author: "PA5MW, Mark" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:06:47 +0100
Oh there is a few good reasons here from EU why some refuse to respond to these 'discussions'; - Our critical input often does not appear here - Whatever diplomacy used, as soon as we seem to *touch
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00151.html (8,973 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ Magazine Continuance (score: 1)
Author: "M. WIJK" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 07:42:25 +0100
Good proposal ! But the easiest and cheapest way to contribute is a subscription to CQ. If your annual major fun lies at contesting in the various CQWW, please consider a donation or take a subscript
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00191.html (8,624 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Question about contest logs (score: 1)
Author: "M. WIJK" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 08:13:05 +0100
OK, I'll bite ;) - Using RBN in a phone contest: *DING* - Working stations which do not count in your contest: *DING* - Making CW QSO in a phone contest: *DING* - Making QSO on a WARC band during pho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-03/msg00014.html (10,008 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] SDR's have knobs too! (score: 1)
Author: "PA5MW, Mark" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 12:06:58 +0200
Software Defined Radios have knobs - and if you want, more than one! So letıs debunk this myth once and for all: 1. Software Defined Radios can and do have knobs No they do not. Not even an ON/OFF sw
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-05/msg00085.html (10,793 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote@WRTC: Come to WRTC 2014 Boston, Operate IARU Radiosport from Vermont, Sweden, Brazil or upstate New York! (score: 1)
Author: Mark van Wijk <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 19:29:17 +0200 (CEST)
in the Netherlands any remote operation *requires* the physical presence of a licenced amateur at the remote station during any transmission. only exception are repeater stations for which a special
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-06/msg00147.html (10,887 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu