Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:pd2r.maarten@gmail.com: 121 ]

Total 121 documents matching your query.

81. [CQ-Contest] Category hopping (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 18:21:22 +0100
I fully agree Ron. People here are talking about the CR3L team making an unethical decision by switching categories. They are playing judge, jury and executioner by condemning CR3L's actions without
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00223.html (10,663 bytes)

82. Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 19:31:06 +0100
Where are the "like" buttons for Mats' and Tonno's posts? Oh wait, this isn't Facebook. Well said gents. 73, Maarten PD2R -- 73, Maarten PD2R _______________________________________________ CQ-Contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00229.html (12,582 bytes)

83. [CQ-Contest] Category hopping (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 22:48:08 +0100
Jeff, YOU feel it's unethical and YOU want them te respond publicly and defend themselves. I think there is nothing wrong with what they did and I would not feel any need to defend myself because acc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00253.html (10,606 bytes)

84. [CQ-Contest] Category hopping (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 23:23:12 +0100
Well Martin, as Michael and Hans pointed out, finding loopholes is something different then rule breaking. Finding loopholes is using a second, third or fourth multiplier radio when entering the Mult
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00256.html (14,863 bytes)

85. Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 19:21:43 +0100
Jeff, why do you only comment on the part where Mike wrote: "They could only be a sore looser if indeed they did loose, but they didn't"? Yes, they would have lost the M/2 category, good point. But w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00303.html (14,380 bytes)

86. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey results - part 1 (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 21:10:03 +0100
Good point Steve, many non native English speakers ask for a repeat when you read their call back to them in a non-phonetics way. As Dutch guy, we tend to have more difficulty with the "i", "e" and "
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00426.html (12,234 bytes)

87. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 00:06:03 +0100
IMHO the intent of the rule is that stations identify frequently. Does it realy matter if they identify at the end of each QSO during a contest where the ending of the QSO is often no more then a 10
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00327.html (15,381 bytes)

88. Re: [CQ-Contest] First Stew Perry! Squee! (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:15:39 +0100
+1 73, Maarten PD2R _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00143.html (7,944 bytes)

89. Re: [CQ-Contest] K5GO speaks out for youth in contesting (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:39:55 +0200
+1. My son is about go to school but I'm sure glad that in my country we don't have to take measures like Scott mentioned (jet). But if we in are not careful we will go down that same road. I have be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00251.html (26,776 bytes)

90. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 22:57:58 +0200
I'd say you already passed ;-) 73, Maarten PD2R _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00099.html (8,154 bytes)

91. [CQ-Contest] CQ San Antonio (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 21:36:24 +0200
Hi all, Rescue International convention. Any contesters in the area that would like to get togther and have a beer with me? I'll be staying at the Menger Hotel. 73, Maarten PD2R Op @ PI4DX __________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-08/msg00046.html (7,084 bytes)

92. [CQ-Contest] Log what was sent (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 09:12:02 +0200
Like David said, CQWW says you should log the correct zone based on the location, not what was send. Same thing with cut numbers used for CQ zone numbers. See:http://www.cqww.com/rules_faq.htm This c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-09/msg00227.html (12,627 bytes)

93. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log what was sent (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 19:48:24 +0200
Maybe it the difference in age or perhaps it has something to do with having a different cultural background, but I don't get why some of you get worked up about this. IMHO the CQWW never had anythin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-09/msg00244.html (10,104 bytes)

94. [CQ-Contest] 40m lower band edge SSB (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:39:56 +0100
Hi Mike, Maybe you're jumping the gun on this one. Could it be that those spots you saw were QRG's where US stations were listening and that they were transmitting above 7200kHz? Did you only see spo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00040.html (10,974 bytes)

95. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi 2 locking device? (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:30:31 +0000
Hi Luis, You could use a 6 pack to prevent two radios on one band. https://www.arraysolutions.com/sixpak-so-dual-rc 73, Maarten PD2R _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-01/msg00058.html (9,840 bytes)

96. Re: [CQ-Contest] Allowing self-spotting (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:27:10 +0000
What if I was to call CQ in CW 2 or 3 times in the Phone section of the band and then switch back to side band again? Would that work? It would certainly not be illegal. 73, Maarten PD2R ____________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00242.html (10,290 bytes)

97. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK CQWW checklog (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2017 06:28:04 +0000
Rudy, I think a DQ is something different than having your log being reclassified as checklog. For instance, your score won't count for WRTC qualification but your not automatically thrown out of the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00036.html (10,233 bytes)

98. Re: [CQ-Contest] Survey results (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:12:41 +0000
+1 73, Maarten PD2R _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00502.html (28,688 bytes)

99. Re: [CQ-Contest] mea culpa (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:55:12 +0000
Come on guys, the majority of the ops participating in contests do have internet. There even are DXpeditions in the middle of nowhere that have online logs so that we can see if we are in the log alm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00568.html (12,065 bytes)

100. Re: [CQ-Contest] mea culpa (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 16:32:00 +0000
Hi Ed, AFAIK this was about live score reporting, not about unassisted vs assisted. Or perhaps I missed something? Furthermore, I appreciate the unassisted category and wouldn't want to see it disapp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00013.html (8,531 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu