It also seems that the contestant was asked for an audio recording the previous year, under the same rule, and failed to provide it then. With a year to think about it, he did the same again. The rul
Good points Steve and RT. I suspect the observed pattern of mults worked might be distinguishable from someone following cluster spots, though - but what do I know, I'm guessing. Peter G4MJS ________
If I might throw my hat in the ring here... The conversation about who-can-win-what-from-where is interesting. There are clearly some aspects of an operation (to enter a contest) you can evolve and i
Sorry Bob you're wrong there. FCC has adopted the CEPT T/R 61-01 regulation to make reciprocal licensing easier. http://www.arrl.org/foreign-licenses-operating-in-u-s Peter G4MJS ____________________
Well if you're operating remotely from outside the US, it doesn't - which is a good part of the point here. The CEPT regulation is written such that it covers the physical presence of a foreign-licen
I found the quote I was referring to : "For the past two days I have been corresponding my a gentleman called Scot Stone, Deputy Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, The FCC
Yes, but the conditions under which the reciprocal privileges are granted (in this case ) are governed by CEPT and adopted by FCC. In order to benefit from the CEPT arrangements, FCC has to adopt its
Bob You failed to quote 97.107(b)(1). Which says :- "The terms of the agreement between the alien's government and the United States;" There is a multilateral operating agreement between the US and t
Bob The scope of CEPT Recommendation T/R 61-01, to which the US is a signatory and under which 97.101 grants reciprocal privileges, is for short-term visitors to the country concerned. By omission, r
Bob Again you ignore inconvenient references. The privileges granted to a control operator under this authorization are: (b) For an amateur service license granted by any country, other than Canada,
Yes, as I predicted. Like I said, I'm done. Peter _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-con
Yes, I completely agree that the rules we've been discussing relate to the reciprocal licensee as control operator. Where they're not the control operator, their licensing status is irrelevant. It re
Bob Maybe the FCC website helps... https://www.fcc.gov/wireless/bureau-divisions/mobility-division/amateur-radio-service/reciprocal-operating-arrangements "Reciprocal operation in a place where the A
And you accuse me of making suppositions.... You're entitled to your interpretation, of course, but it's way different from what the authoritative sources actually say. "Operator privileges are those
That is a piece of astonishingly incompetent rule-setting. Peter G4MJS _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
The statistics show that a non-zero number of stations identify as assisted, and another non-zero number identify as unassisted. Assuming neither sets of people do so under duress, what justification
So in conclusion:- Peter G4MJS _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
2) depends on the regulations in the country you're visiting. Your examples are the common case, especially when CEPT regulations apply. But it's not universal. Peter G4MJS __________________________
Could someone post a link that describes the HQ section limits as referred to? The ARRL page http://www.arrl.org/iaru-hf-championship doesn't do so, and the IARU page http://www.iaru.org/contests.htm
Chris If there's no trailing synchronisation token at the end of the CQ (which is what the 'TEST' is), the calling station is more likely to hesitate before calling and/or not call until after the ne