Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 04:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Bingo, Jim! We have a winner! Radiosports in the 21st Century should be exploiting 21st Century technology in its support. The contest robots were a good start, but there is a lot of room for improve
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 04:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
Yuri's note was spot on! The problem is that contest rules engender the wrong personality in their participants. Sponsors seem to believe that it is their responsibility to establish entry categories
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 20:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
The solution for that would probably be made on a thread titled, "Maybe a better idea for plaques". Simply humor, Yuri...no offense intended. Ev, W2EV ________________________________________________
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 20:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
BRILLIANT! Well done Bruce! Ev, W2EV ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs _______________________________
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 04:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
Of course that's right. They are restricted only once they decide to submit a log. They must, at that time, decide what 'category' their operation fit. I also agree that the sponsors should be design
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 16:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
That's the truth, Zack! My hand's up. :) Ev, W2EV __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.co
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
Don raises a great point. If one were to attempt to defray the costs of running an event, what monetary sources could be explored? For instance...(if anything) would make it worth while to charge an
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 12:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
Ken, None of the email addresses that I have for you seem to be working. Please reply direct. I have a question for you. Regards, Ev Tupis, W2EV ____________________________________________________ S
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 12:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3A+pecuniary Lesson: don't use your on-air activity to solicit personal monetary income. Nothing more or less. See the next-to-the-last paragraph in this n
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Bill, The point is that the rules are simple, unambiguous (as you point out, too) and the word "pecuniary" (found in the FCC rules) is clearly defined in the dictionary. There is no need to -- as
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
This thread was about understanding the context within which the FCC interprets items of "pecuniary interest"...not intentional interference. That would be a different discussion. Kind regards, Ev, W
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 05:56:16 -0800 (PST)
Taken to an extreme, once "received modulation recognician" (without regard as to it being CW or Voice or PSK31 or ...) is attained, stations can be auto-logged, too. That means that the only items d
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 03:21:06 -0800 (PST)
Who does one approach to ask probing questions about the Cabrillo format...officially, please? Ev __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 02:04:38 -0800 (PST)
After a brief confusion, it appears that I have gotten the right information...Trey it is! :) Thank you to everyone who responded. Regards, [UU]2 Ev __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!?
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 13:28:50 -0800 (PST)
Please accept this as a one-time OT post. I am attempting to find the person or company who is responsible for having developed the eHam.net website. There is a public K-12 school in my area who want
Please reply direct, off-list. Your opinion is sought, but not your opinion of an opinion, yet. :) Brainstorm request. In your opinion: 1. What station (or hardware) factors are at play in determinin
I was hoping that someone would ask this question. I believe that _we_ define it (many here seem to have already, haven't they?), then we compete to whatever that definition is. Submitting to a centr
Hi Pete, There is no ominous intent here. I'm Ev, W2EV. I'm attempting to segregate my email accounts by area of interest...nothing more. If anyone were so inclined, they could easily check the IP ad
I think a lot of folks to things as Steve does (I sure do). As obvious as it seems 90% of us will not place in the top 10 % of scores submitted. We need (and improvise) something else to motivate our
Hi Pat, Answered in an earlier email. Ev, W2EV. Think nice thoughts, no controversy here. :) Interesting comment, but before we assume this is a problem, let's assume that it isn't. :) -- Do you Yaho