CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [CQ-Contest] Voice Automation Enhancements and the future

To: CQ-Contest MailList <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Voice Automation Enhancements and the future
From: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 05:56:16 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
--- Mike Clarson <mclarson@rcc.com> wrote:
> Next step is voice
> recognition/CW recognition. If
> the computer does the copying, then there would
> really be no difference
> between a phone or CW (or for that matter, digital
> mode or digitized
> voice)contest. Any thoughts

Taken to an extreme, once "received modulation
recognician" (without regard as to it being CW or
Voice or PSK31 or ...) is attained, stations can be
auto-logged, too.  That means that the only items
differentiating station scores become (1) Local
Propagation and (2) station performance.  Operator
skill will be effectively removed from the equation. 
By the way...this was actually attempted using Packet
technology a few times in the past.

Ev



                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>