Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:radiosporting@yahoo.com: 178 ]

Total 178 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] Mode Specificity [was: WW SSB] (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:44:06 -0800 (PST)
Mode is a factor in both of these events, Dave. The rules allow only Phone and CW. No PSK31, Packet, RTTY, JT-modes, etc. For instance...with sunspots at a mimimum, a 10-meter operation would do wel
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00700.html (8,694 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] Mode Specificity [was: WW SSB] (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:58:42 -0800 (PST)
Several folks have mentioned "Field Day". Interestingly, mode is a factor there, too. You can actually make three QSO's with the same station on the same frequency band: phone, CW and "any other dig
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00704.html (7,902 bytes)

63. [CQ-Contest] Artificial Categorization [was: Mode Specificity [was:WW SSB]] (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 05:53:17 -0800 (PST)
Great point, Mike! I think that this is part of a good strategy for a "Perfect Contest", actually. A "Perfect Contest" is about making QSO's with unique stations. With each "layer" of restricting the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00220.html (9,174 bytes)

64. [CQ-Contest] The Next Generation [was: VE8AT NCDXF Beacon?] (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 06:09:42 -0800 (PST)
While I hope that someone can still answer Kirk's question... I thought this might be interesting for folks to think about... I won't take a lot of time on this list on this topic (hopefully just thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00221.html (9,803 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] Mode Specificity [was: WW SSB] (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 06:21:45 -0800 (PST)
And this is an important difference between HF and VHF. Thanks for pointing this out, Dave. On VHF, one simply switches modes, not frequency. It's OK to be engaged in an SSB contest-QSO on 144.210 an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00224.html (8,882 bytes)

66. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 06:28:54 -0800 (PST)
This seems to be a common misunderstanding among HF contesters (that VHFers don't seem to have). There's a strategy called "HamIM" that uses high-powered, RF-based, simplex APRS (packet) to track Rov
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00226.html (10,026 bytes)

67. Re: [CQ-Contest] Which would make better stubs? (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 06:32:29 -0800 (PST)
QQ, It's an issue of Q. :) A stub made from 1-5/8 heliax will have a higher Q and power handling than one made of RG-58/u. Ev, W2EV http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest http://list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00228.html (10,348 bytes)

68. [CQ-Contest] Really QRP? [was: QRPers --- Please QRQ] (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:27:58 -0800 (PST)
Amateur Radio contesting - like Golf - depends on the integrety of the participants in this regard. Wouldn't it be cool if (some day) logging software interfaced directly with the final amp and repor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00296.html (8,785 bytes)

69. [CQ-Contest] More Contesting-in-the-Daylight stuff [was:QRPers..Illegal?] (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 03:31:28 -0800 (PST)
By the way, this is the very reason for the calculation of the "Performance Index" in the real-time score revealing system described here: http://w2ev.rochesterny.org/DXDashLogger Interested folks ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00305.html (7,837 bytes)

70. [CQ-Contest] Drawing the Line [was: SO2R -- revised opinion?] (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:54:46 -0800 (PST)
Great rhetorical question, Bob. People contest for different reasons. I believe that "the perfect contest" allows the operator to reveal the parameters of their operation (if they are ethical about t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00423.html (9,817 bytes)

71. Re: [CQ-Contest] Competitor Friendly Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 06:54:38 -0800 (PST)
Wouldn't it be nice if you could easily compare how you scored against others with similar operating time, ERP, band, geographical limitations? Add a real time score displaying component and you have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00456.html (9,319 bytes)

72. Re: [VHFcontesting] [CQ-Contest] Competitor Friendly Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 06:33:16 -0800 (PST)
stepped This is exactly what happened for the Fall VHF Sprints this year. A new real-time score-revealing logging system was released and a "contest within a contest" was run, using that system. How'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00542.html (9,837 bytes)

73. Re: [CQ-Contest] station available arrl 160m (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 05:07:19 -0800 (PST)
If that doesn't work for you, for loan -- I have a 40 meter hamstick and three-pod magnet mount (with the heavy-duty magnet option) and a tuner. <G> Ev, W2EV __________________________________ Yahoo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00554.html (7,372 bytes)

74. Re: [CQ-Contest] Just Supposin' (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 21:19:26 -0800 (PST)
Since international callsigns are ok...then how about these... <grin> Ev, W2EV __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL ? Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yaho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00666.html (7,433 bytes)

75. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fixing contests (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:27:03 -0800 (PST)
... Yeah, baby! http://commfaculty.fullerton.edu/woverbeck/rover.htm <grin> Ev __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com _______________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00774.html (7,779 bytes)

76. [VHFcontesting] CWACing the Stew Perry Top Band Challenge (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 04:42:04 -0800 (PST)
PREFACE: This note is being sent to both CQ-Contest@ and VHFcontest@ lists because there are common interests noted below. You may wish to print this e-mail out, as it includes specific info that can
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00063.html (10,875 bytes)

77. [CQ-Contest] Refocusing from One-point QSO's (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 03:52:45 -0800 (PST)
http://w2ev.rochesterny.org/DXDashLogger allows for all of these strategies. It was developed (is being developed, actually) as a solution to an unrealized problem. You just summed up the problem qui
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00064.html (8,170 bytes)

78. Re: [VHFcontesting] [CQ-Contest] CWACing the Stew Perry Top BandChallenge (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 10:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Hi Folks, Someone dropped me a direct note and said that some may be hedging against joining the DXDashLogger yahoogroup list for fear of receiving a lot of unwanted ads. Here's a strategy that works
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00067.html (7,858 bytes)

79. [VHFcontesting] 10 Meters Comes Alive (and 6m too) (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 04:06:44 -0800 (PST)
10 meters is already opening along North America's east coast and the sun is just now rising. Will today be a repeat of yesterday? Maybe! :) Here is an animation (1.8mb in size) of yesterday's 10 met
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00079.html (7,187 bytes)

80. Re: [CQ-Contest] What to expect from 10 meters??? (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:07:57 -0800 (PST)
That's the cool thing about 10-meters, Jacob. You never can tell for sure. :) The past two days have been a-w-e-s-o-m-e. Take a look at a map of the propagation noted for the previous 24 hours: http:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00138.html (8,177 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu