Mail Archive Search: <+from:rx9tx@qrz.ru>

Results:

References: [ +from:rx9tx@qrz.ru: 62 ]

Total 62 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 12:12:06 +0000; Hi number of received logs, 2005: WPX CW - 2061 WPX SSB - 2437 ARRL DX CW - 2572 Russian DX - 2579 (+570 logs this year, and this number increases every year, yet) CQWW CW - 3802 CQWW SSB - 4092 Wond; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00007.html (8,668 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 14:59:32 +0000; Hello Jeff, Tuesday, August 2, 2005 Jeff Maass wrote to N7MAL: From the other hand, I would like to see ARRL-sponsored contest results available for everyone, not only ARRL members :) Again, Russian; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00029.html (9,727 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Support (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 11:32:45 +0000; Hello Kelly, Thursday, August 4, 2005 Kelly Taylor wrote to Andrei Nevis: I can't buy that single sopy here, and I wouldn't want to buy it to know my results in internet era, as well as I wouldn't wa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00096.html (9,665 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Support (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 14:07:42 +0000; Hello Andrei, Thursday, August 4, 2005 Andrei Nevis wrote to Art RX9TX: As well as those not subscribed to CQ and those non-members of ARRL? They try to sell me what THEY should pay for :) So yes, I'; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00105.html (10,317 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 15:44:36 +0000; Hello CQ-CONTEST, Saturday, August 6, 2005 Kelly Taylor wrote to Alan Zack: Then if CQ magazine is a commercial operation and they sell us contest results, they should pay us for submitting our logs.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00161.html (9,787 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 16:03:38 +0000; Hello kd4d, Saturday, August 6, 2005 kd4d@comcast.net wrote to CQ-CONTEST@contesting.com: Then I can see no sense in closing access to "Web Report" and "Scores Database" for non members. -- 73...Art; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00162.html (9,616 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:27:26 +0000; Hello Igor, Monday, July 25, 2005 Igor Sokolov wrote to KI9A@aol.com: You're not honest with us, Igor. Last year you told us that you had uploaded all your logs to the LoTW when it was in beta-testin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00433.html (9,927 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:26:58 +0000; Hello cq-contest, Monday, July 25, 2005 Igor Sokolov wrote to Ted Bryant: There's nothing "magic" with that as every QSL manager is encouraged to upload the logs of the station he/she manages to the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00481.html (9,763 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:44:12 +0000; Hello cq-contest, Monday, July 25, 2005 Warren C. Stankiewicz wrote to cq-contest@contesting.com: We work for HR#1 or Challenge not for a "piece of paper" or plaque. Your words about a cup of coffee; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00482.html (13,489 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:59:25 +0000; Hello cq-contest, Tuesday, July 26, 2005 Charles Morrison wrote to cq-contest@contesting.com: Wow! I did not know there's a logger that can do that all already. I'll ask for that in L32 reflector :); /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00485.html (9,946 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:13:46 +0000; Hello cq-contest, Tuesday, July 26, 2005 SGT Korey Chandler wrote to 'N7MAL': That's right in my case at least :) I think we have the right solution now - change it on the user's end - logging softwa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00506.html (9,624 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:21:34 +0000; Hello Bill, Thursday, July 28, 2005 Bill Turner wrote to Joe Subich, W4TV: Bill you don't understand, no matter what security method is used logging programs will need hours and hours of programming; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00529.html (10,295 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:27:26 +0000; Hello Igor, Monday, July 25, 2005 Igor Sokolov wrote to KI9A@aol.com: You're not honest with us, Igor. Last year you told us that you had uploaded all your logs to the LoTW when it was in beta-testin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01022.html (9,927 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:26:58 +0000; Hello cq-contest, Monday, July 25, 2005 Igor Sokolov wrote to Ted Bryant: There's nothing "magic" with that as every QSL manager is encouraged to upload the logs of the station he/she manages to the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01070.html (9,763 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:44:12 +0000; Hello cq-contest, Monday, July 25, 2005 Warren C. Stankiewicz wrote to cq-contest@contesting.com: We work for HR#1 or Challenge not for a "piece of paper" or plaque. Your words about a cup of coffee; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01071.html (13,489 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:59:25 +0000; Hello cq-contest, Tuesday, July 26, 2005 Charles Morrison wrote to cq-contest@contesting.com: Wow! I did not know there's a logger that can do that all already. I'll ask for that in L32 reflector :); /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01074.html (9,946 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:13:46 +0000; Hello cq-contest, Tuesday, July 26, 2005 SGT Korey Chandler wrote to 'N7MAL': That's right in my case at least :) I think we have the right solution now - change it on the user's end - logging softwa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01095.html (9,624 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:21:34 +0000; Hello Bill, Thursday, July 28, 2005 Bill Turner wrote to Joe Subich, W4TV: Bill you don't understand, no matter what security method is used logging programs will need hours and hours of programming; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01118.html (10,295 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] New German calls (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:06:22 +0000; Hello Randy, Monday, August 15, 2005 Randy Thompson wrote to cq-contest@contesting.com: I liked DD2D :) They opened 2x1 call for club stations (former D*0 calls). -- 73...Art RX9TX 15-Aug-05 12:03 UT; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00282.html (7,394 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Pay to Play (score: 1): Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>; Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:56:16 +0000; Hello Jim, Monday, August 15, 2005 Jim Idelson wrote to CQ-Contest Post: avocations players All of the above you mention can't be compared with ham radio contests, just because contesters are spread; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00296.html (8,873 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]