Mail Archive Search: <+from:sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu>

Results:

References: [ +from:sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu: 198 ]

Total 198 documents matching your query.

141. CT 7.13 (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Nov 30 15:41:55 1992; I think I discovered a bug in mine this weekend. When I use the note pad, the note window appears only the first time after I load CT. After that, I can type in and store a note, but the window never; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00204.html (6,410 bytes)
142. QRP S-W-E-E-P-stakes (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Nov 9 12:23:33 1992; I agree with Alan, I'll work ANYONE who answers my CQ. Lots of QRP stations had very good signals last weekend. Some of the really tough ones were in the "A" category, but really weak on backscatter.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00208.html (7,240 bytes)
143. EQUALISED DX Contest (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Nov 18 16:05:27 1992; I think the point of this whole discussion is that it would be interesting to have ONE contest that depended mostly on operating skill, instead of hardware and geography. There's no question that the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00210.html (7,636 bytes)
144. Equlized contest (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Tue Nov 24 11:41:07 1992; With the end of the cold war, we were wondering what became of all the jamming transmitters. And here we thought the reason the UA's were getting louder was improving conditions! Thanks, Andy, for a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00212.html (6,435 bytes)
145. Better potatos... (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Nov 25 09:26:35 1992; No, no, Tree. You have it all wrong! It's those guys with the low antennas and big amplifiers that are putting all their RF into the garden instead of the ionosphere! 73, Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00213.html (6,461 bytes)
146. K9MA CQWW CW Score (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Nov 30 11:23:22 1992; Single operator, unassisted: Band QSO Z C 160 7 4 4 80 64 14 31 40 145 23 64 20 388 35 88 15 441 34 85 10 350 29 70 Tot 1393 139 342 1,913,418 (Rough, may not quite add up right yet.) Antennas: TH-7; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00215.html (6,605 bytes)
147. more WW CW (what else?) (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Nov 30 15:33:12 1992; It's hard to believe the bad coax switch was really hurting your rates that much. A 1 dB loss couldn't possibly affect your rates that much, but would have resulted in an average dissipation of 100 W; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00217.html (6,841 bytes)
148. CT 7.13 (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Nov 30 15:41:55 1992; I think I discovered a bug in mine this weekend. When I use the note pad, the note window appears only the first time after I load CT. After that, I can type in and store a note, but the window never; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00218.html (6,432 bytes)
149. more WW CW (what else?) (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 2 11:14:56 1992; On the hot coax switch question, I suppose it's possible that the mismatch it introduced was detuning the amplifier so badly that only a fraction of the normal output was getting to the antenna(s). T; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00016.html (6,942 bytes)
150. Multiplier question (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 2 11:18:32 1992; Is the penalty for a claiming multiplier which is then deleted by the judges greater than just the loss of the multiplier, assuming you made a valid contact? Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00017.html (6,719 bytes)
151. XY3ABC/QRP (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Thu Dec 3 11:29:28 1992; A couple times, a /QRP station made a point of REPEATING his call with the /QRP, when I responded with only his (correct) call. That wastes time twice! Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00034.html (6,186 bytes)
152. questionable multipliers (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Thu Dec 3 16:25:18 1992; To: ERIC.L.SCACE@sprintintl.sprint.com I can see losing the QSO points, without further penalty, if the station worked is proven to be unlicensed. But what if I work a licensed operator, but claim th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00044.html (7,447 bytes)
153. 160 Contest (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Dec 7 12:33:42 1992; Yes, there were plenty of those alligators, all right. Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00091.html (6,268 bytes)
154. WKD B4 (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 9 09:14:33 1992; Certainly, the safe thing to do is to work the dupe, especially in a contest with a short exchange, and log it for zero points. Then, of course, don't delete it from your log. For any one of a number; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00112.html (7,669 bytes)
155. Mosley PRO-67B (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 9 13:53:22 1992; Does anyone have any experience with this antenna? If it works as well on 10-15-20 as the TH-7 and KT-34XA, it could be the solution for those of us with limited space who need some gain on 40, and m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00128.html (6,754 bytes)
156. WKD B4 (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 9 15:14:07 1992; Another reason to just work and log the dupes is the proliferation of similar calls: K3NA, K5NA, K3ZO, K9ZO, etc. With so many of the short callsigns in use by active contest operators, that's not su; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00137.html (7,539 bytes)
157. Why??? (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Fri Dec 11 09:57:14 1992; There's just no explaining these things. K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00150.html (6,130 bytes)
158. 10 M Score, K9MA (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Mon Dec 14 14:54:06 1992; CW only, high power, unassisted, not a serious effort: 446 Q, 43 C, 46 S, 156K Points (This is rough, as my CT files don't seem to be working quite right.) 73, Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00166.html (6,347 bytes)
159. Questions on Antennas (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Fri Dec 18 14:40:05 1992; As far as I know, the consensus seems to be that there isn't too much difference in performance between the TH-7 and the KT34XA, in spite of the fact the the KT34XA has a longer boom. Perhaps others; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00201.html (6,836 bytes)
160. New op on line (score: 1): Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: Wed Dec 23 11:03:57 1992; 73, Tim K3LR (No Western PA is not the east coast!) No, but it's about 20 dB closer than Wisconsin! 73, Scott K9MA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00230.html (6,239 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]