Mail Archive Search: <+from:tom@klient.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:tom@klient.com: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 x 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: "Tom McAlee" <tom@klient.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:31:38 -0400; Short callsigns, especially on CW, probably help the rate. But, a callsign like W3LPL has the huge advantage of being known by everyone from years of top-notch operations. Operating 80 meters there,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00219.html (8,372 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL says no to opening logs... (score: 1): Author: "Tom McAlee" <tom@klient.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:04:48 -0400; Dave - I think the issue is that people can send off a QSL and receive a response for a QSO they never made if they notice in a log search that someone else's call was busted as their own. Not that I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00177.html (13,076 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW (score: 1): Author: "Tom McAlee" <tom@klient.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:00:42 -0500; We found it easier to send "5NN MD" than try to explain no USA contacts were needed. They were obviously just casual operators; I'm not surprised they didn't read the rules. Come Sweepstakes you'll b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00264.html (9,888 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logic Here (score: 1): Author: "Tom McAlee" <tom@klient.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:35:55 -0500; Here is an email that I sent to the PVRC list regarding the 80m situation this weekend. I had quite a few people stop by this weekend and tell me how it was rediculous that I was operating split and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00074.html (13,915 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (score: 1): Author: "Tom McAlee" <tom@klient.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 00:48:42 -0400; I noticed that as well. Not surprisingly, I noticed that it coincided with spots that were off. If someone spotted us 200Hz off, it was a safe bet that many of the next callers would be 200Hz off. Th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00005.html (9,508 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] 0 points and "Leveling the playing field" (score: 1): Author: "Tom McAlee" <tom@klient.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 15:17:34 -0400; the big 3 (possibly even including K9NS) still get zero points for USA I don't have all of the 2006 numbers. But, looking at 2005 MM results, the overall points-per-QSO were: SSB K3LR 2.532 KC1XX 2.6; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00182.html (10,647 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] 4U1UN on 80m (score: 1): Author: "Tom McAlee" <tom@klient.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:57:04 -0500; At W3LPL we worked 4U1UN on every band except 80m. Sunday morning they were CQing with few callers on 10m. We asked if they would work us on 80m but our request was ignored. I do not believe they eve; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00435.html (8,703 bytes)
28. Re: [CQ-Contest] IMMEDIATE NEED Phillystrand cable (score: 1): Author: "Tom McAlee" <tom@klient.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 18:09:06 -0400; You can sometimes find it on ebay. But, you'll have to search for it by its correct name (Phillystran not Phillystrand) otherwise it won't show in the search results. Right now there is some 1/2" Phi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00017.html (8,041 bytes)
29. Re: [CQ-Contest] 80 Meter Phone Split Operation (score: 1): Author: "Tom McAlee" <tom@klient.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:33:10 -0500; Because what sounds like a good frequency to you may very well be a mess in EU. There may be loud splatter from a station 3KHz away that you don't hear on your frequency that will prevent you from be; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00157.html (8,624 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 29
Page: [1] [2]