Hi Andy and all, May I disagree with some of your statements given in the PDF presentation regarding TRlog. In Advanced Features you did not mention one very important thing. The unique feature of TR
application running on top of a DOS operating system. Win NT, 2000, XP and I hate to mention it: Vista. All of these systems do not allow direct access to ports as DOS does and this is the reason th
POST which is part of TRlog does that. New incarnation of TRlog called TR4W runs this utility in Windows environment. See here http://www.rescab.nm.ru 73, Igor UA9CDC do _____________________________
Looking for some contesters in Italy to meet. I am in Venice today (6 of December) and tomorrow. Then I move to Rome and stay there till the 13th of December. It would be great to visit some contest
This is 21st century.... What tape you are talking about. Get yourself cheap MP3 player with line input and 1-2Gig of memory and you can easily record 48 hours 2 radio and get file transferred to you
While everybody seems to be interested in SO2R and its advantages, here http://ua9clb.narod.ru are couple of audio files from recent CQWW CW that show how it can be done. 73, Igor UA9CDC ____________
RAEM contest starts in just few hours. Scoring is based on distance therefore even very few QSO may bring pretty good score. I hope there will be some participation from North America. 80, 40 and 20
What Scott describes below is almost exactly and in full realized in the hardware of Expert-1kW Italian transistor amplifier http://www.radio-ham.eu/Expert1K-FA.htm The only difference is that Rig#2
You can use one set of filters because each of you rigs is on different band at any given time. 2 SIX PACKS from WX0B and one set of filters (W3NQN filters are the best choice) can do the job. But se
I would suggest contest sponsors check this chat against submitted logs. There are some other calls that were active in the contest. ES9C, UR4LRG , RL3FT for RL3A to name just a few. If their contest
I think one can go even farther and put a series of dots and dashes into the submitted log. After all that is what was sent :) 73, Igor UA9CDC _______________________________________________ CQ-Conte
Just subscribe to TR4W reflector on yahoogroups tr4w-subscribe@yahoogroups.com Just subscribe and ask there. English is used there as well as Russian. 73, Igor UA9CDC ________________________________
You can achieve the same by just listening to W3WH QSO and a bit before and after that. I am really glad the logs of CQWW participants are published on the web now.That makes me trust contest result
Bob, since you do not turn in logs you probably would not mind not getting QSL cards as well. It should be reciprical :) 73, Igor UA9CDC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest ma
Hi Bob, That is exactly the case with almost all the Russian contests including international contests and at least some of the EU contests. They only count QSO if the corresponding log is submitted
How about the fact that number of submitted logs (and therefore number of participants) in RDXC is greater then in WPX and a way more then in ARRL? How about the fact that RDXC worth more points for
Kevin, I am not speaking on behalf of RDXC committee. Just my own opinion. In order for any QSO to be counted as valid both, a call sign and control number have to be recorded in the log. I suppose y
I think scoring by number of submitted logs is the best. Would be interesting to see how many logs there will be this year in RDXC, WPX and IARU, 73, Igor UA9CDC _____________________________________
Val, RDXC reveals the total number of received logs explicitly. You can get it here. http://www.rdxc.org/asp/pages/stat_c.asp?ID=0 WPX 2006 article results does not do that . You have to count it man
IMHO Ranko is absolutely right. Here are the arguments: 1)Why ENN in cw contest is legal and silent omission of the default 59 in SSB contest is not? IMHO such omission is simply the extreme shorteni