- 1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 20:55:17 +0600
- On the other hand in marginal conditions when DX station got your call sign correct first time do not keep repeating your call again when giving the exchange. That may make the DX station think he go
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00059.html (12,383 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Support (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 21:19:49 +0600
- Being not subscribed to CQ one will not get his results. That is fine if you are in the contest to get couple of more new countries and have general fun. But then one should not feel to be obliged to
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00062.html (11,041 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Top 10 Contests??? (score: 1)
- Author: ua9cdc@r66.ru (Igor sokolov)
- Date: Sat Mar 16 11:55:20 2002
- Russian DX contest starts in 4 hours from now. See the details and results on www.rdxc.org According to the statistics on that site there were 6500 participants and over 1200 logs sent last year. The
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00307.html (8,390 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] 2002 Russian DX Contest - Claimed Scores 17Mar2002 (score: 1)
- Author: ua9cdc@r66.ru (Igor sokolov)
- Date: Mon Mar 18 08:38:14 2002
- We had to compensate for the slipless night so most of the scores from Russiand will show up later. At RF9C we made this year around 2860 QSO for the total score of 8,7 million points. Unfortunately
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00329.html (7,140 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:08:43 +0600
- I agree with Bill fully. LOTW is missing participation from a lot of users because of the complexity. None of those whom I know here in UA9 is on LOTW although there are several on eQSL.CC I have tri
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00426.html (11,263 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:13:43 +0600
- lot of in LOTW 55000 QSO had stage, send I always liked new ideas and always tried to be amongst the first to try them. I indeed been participating in beta testing of LOTW because I thought it will
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00453.html (10,786 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:26:39 +0600
- Art RX9TX. I can confirm what Art Isn't it interesting Ted? And yet I never sent my logs or photocopy of my licence and passport by post to the LOTW as they require. So you only confirm that despite
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00456.html (9,433 bytes)
- 8. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:58:46 +0600
- Not at all Vladimir. I did not blame LOTW for forged confirmations. I just said that I did not send them by post required photocopies and I did not upload there my logs. But I did give the permission
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00493.html (11,187 bytes)
- 9. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:33:53 +0600
- Really strange that we find so many supporters of "bullet proof" security used in the LOTW. IMHO DXCC program is no different from most of the contests. In fact it is sort of contest with no time lim
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00548.html (10,935 bytes)
- 10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Everyone uses CT (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 01:54:02 +0600
- Great news Tree, I am prepared to wait even 10 years. IMHO TRlog is the best contest logger ever and only you can change that. I have also tried CT in the distant past and never could get used to INS
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00648.html (8,845 bytes)
- 11. Re: [CQ-Contest] HQ station thing (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:56:08 +0600
- not being limited by anything eg own interference limits) not allowing averege stations to join the fun which actually contraproductive for the contest. technical challanges (the two cornerstones of
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00760.html (9,250 bytes)
- 12. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-1000MP (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 17:56:39 +0600
- Icom then dual with the receive on 2 for dual receiver. buys are I agree. 765 and 850 (right in this order, because 850 is missing CLEAR RIT button) are the best buys for contests in under 1000$ cla
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00847.html (10,636 bytes)
- 13. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-1000MP (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:21:20 +0600
- Sorry Dave, I have to disagree. We tried "TUNED" setting with 3 different FT1000MP. They are all fine in the city but being used from 8Q7 we could not copy those whom we easily worked using IC775. Ra
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00862.html (10,279 bytes)
- 14. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-1000MP (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:20:51 +0600
- I got my IC751a when visiting Washington DC 10 years ago. It was second hand radio even then. The battery here still does not show any sign of deterioration. When it does - there are other options th
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00872.html (12,954 bytes)
- 15. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:08:43 +0600
- I agree with Bill fully. LOTW is missing participation from a lot of users because of the complexity. None of those whom I know here in UA9 is on LOTW although there are several on eQSL.CC I have tri
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01015.html (11,263 bytes)
- 16. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:13:43 +0600
- lot of in LOTW 55000 QSO had stage, send I always liked new ideas and always tried to be amongst the first to try them. I indeed been participating in beta testing of LOTW because I thought it will
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01042.html (10,786 bytes)
- 17. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:26:39 +0600
- Art RX9TX. I can confirm what Art Isn't it interesting Ted? And yet I never sent my logs or photocopy of my licence and passport by post to the LOTW as they require. So you only confirm that despite
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01045.html (9,433 bytes)
- 18. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:58:46 +0600
- Not at all Vladimir. I did not blame LOTW for forged confirmations. I just said that I did not send them by post required photocopies and I did not upload there my logs. But I did give the permission
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01082.html (11,187 bytes)
- 19. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:33:53 +0600
- Really strange that we find so many supporters of "bullet proof" security used in the LOTW. IMHO DXCC program is no different from most of the contests. In fact it is sort of contest with no time lim
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01137.html (10,935 bytes)
- 20. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-M Question (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 23:54:28 +0600
- Extract from the CQ-M rules Therefore you are allowed to work anyone including your own country. Just very much the same as in any WW contest. 73, Igor UA9CDC really tell ____________________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00129.html (8,907 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu