Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve3iay@gmail.com: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] This week's CWTs (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 21:00:26 -0500
This week, the regular CWT sessions on Wednesday at 1300Z and 1900Z and Thursday at 0300Z will be special slow-speed (20 WPM or less) sessions to welcome new graduates of the CWops CW Academy. Past a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00063.html (6,962 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 17:32:27 -0500
Steve, Don't try to *install* MMTTY twice. Install it once, then create a new folder somewhere and *copy* the mmtty.exe, mmtty.ini and userparms.ini files into the new folder (also any extfsk files,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-12/msg00150.html (7,123 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 20:51:31 -0500
That's correct. Each copy of MMTTY needs to have its own separate setup - that's why they are run from two separate folders, because MMTTY stores its configuration data in the same folder as the exec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-12/msg00155.html (11,811 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 not allowed in Winter Field Day? (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 17:08:16 -0500
There is an underlying technical issue here. The FT8 data protocol is very tightly packed, and there is no room in it for arbitrary exchanges (other than the 13-character "free text" messages, which
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-01/msg00117.html (8,899 bytes)

25. [CQ-Contest] Slow-speed CWTs this week (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:51:24 -0400
This is a reminder that this week's CWTs will be slow-speed (20 WPM or less, please) to welcome the latest graduating class from the CWops CW Academy. Graduates, profs and alumni may be sending CWA i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00053.html (7,463 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Slow-speed CWTs this week (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:46:48 -0400
No number needed - the exchange is your name and state/province/country if you are not a CWops member, name and number if you are a member. CWTs are every Wednesday at 1300Z, 1900Z and 0300Z, and las
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00057.html (9,831 bytes)

27. [CQ-Contest] Slow-speed CWTs this week (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 14:39:23 -0400
Here is a reminder that this week's CWTs will be slow-speed (20 WPM or less, please) to welcome the latest graduating class from the CWops CW Academy. Graduates, profs and alumni may be sending CWA i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00089.html (8,134 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] WWDIGI Contest Testing... (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:02:51 -0400
It seems to me that a lot of this discussion is missing a key point. The problem is not what to do when you have 100% copy; the default protocol takes care of that. It's what to do when copy is poor/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-07/msg00157.html (11,112 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 vs FT4 in the Contest (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 08:49:15 -0400
N1UR said: "...what's the point of FT4?" The exchanges in the two modes are identical. The difference is that FT4 is twice as fast as FT8, but of course you don't get something for nothing. FT4 is le
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-09/msg00012.html (8,213 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 vs FT4 in the Contest (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 16:16:07 -0400
The operator of WSJT-X does, in theory, have complete control. At any time the operator can override the automation and decide what to send next. The problem is that there is only a second or so betw
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-09/msg00024.html (10,935 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Precedence? (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 19:30:32 -0500
Here is the trick I use. It depends on the fact that N1MM+ has 24 function key message memories, 12 for Run mode and 12 for S&P. In the Run set of messages, I program F9-F12 with NR?, PR?, CK? and SE
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00060.html (8,994 bytes)

32. [CQ-Contest] Slower-speed CWTs this week (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 20:06:11 -0500
For those of you who would like to participate in one of more of this week's CWT mini-tests but who are not members of the cwops group at groups.io, here is a reminder that this week's CWTs are speci
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00072.html (8,224 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Question (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 19:14:04 -0500
Carol, The answers to your questions depend on what software you are using. The scrolling cannot be slowed down permanently without losing data, but some software may allow you to pause scrolling tem
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00112.html (7,315 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] N1MM+, K3 Sidetone Macro (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 17:20:20 -0500
If you are planning on putting the mute and unmute macros in the same function key message, things get complicated. Basically, I believe you would have to do something like this: F1 CQ,{CAT1ASC ML000
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00136.html (8,260 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] There goes the Clean Sweep (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 08:46:50 -0500
Somehow I doubt whether the new PE section will make clean sweeps impossible or even that much more difficult; the retirement of the VY1AAA station in NT is a bigger threat to the clean sweep. 73, Ri
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00028.html (8,175 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 question (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 19:14:21 -0500
Did you start up WSJT-X from the Window > Load WSJT/JTDX menu tem? If not, there won't be anything for the decode list window to display. It shows only call signs of stations that the connected copy
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00049.html (7,457 bytes)

37. [CQ-Contest] Slow-speed CWTs this week (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 20:09:54 -0400
For those who participate in the Wednesday CWTs but who aren't members of the CWops groups.io group, here is a reminder that this week's CWTs will be slow speed -- under 20 wpm, please. The CWTs on t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00036.html (7,384 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] [cwops] WPX CW Signal Quality Concerns (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2020 18:16:25 -0400
You want to be careful using too large a value for TX DLY in the K3/K3S. Making the delay longer shortens the duration of transmitted dits and dahs, and can make the CW sound "choppy", especially at
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00137.html (7,363 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] Should RTTY be LSB or USB or something else? (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2020 12:10:08 -0400
It depends on your software, and on whether you are using FSK or AFSK. If you are using FSK, your radio's receiver will be on the lower sideband regardless of what band you are on, and your software
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-08/msg00024.html (7,385 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] N1MM CW set up for SS (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 08:59:17 -0500
I suggest that you look at < https://n1mmwp.hamdocs.com/manual-supported/contests-setup/setup-hf-contests/#SSCW Read it all, including the description of the F2 message key contents. 73, Rich VE3KI I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00013.html (7,246 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu