Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w0mu@w0mu.com: 1003 ]

Total 1003 documents matching your query.

281. Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:41:22 -0700
All this for a plaque or piece of paper to hang on a wall. I wonder what lengths people would go to win a real prize. W0MU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00335.html (9,195 bytes)

282. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 21:02:16 -0700
They need to clarify what Web technology means. The first rule sounds to me more like an attempt to prohibit the use of remote receiving sites. With the aging ham population, more and more areas havi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00341.html (12,550 bytes)

283. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:54:13 -0700
I am in the fire service and we joke about this..../fire service/ being /200 years/ of tradition unimpeded by progress Apparently many in Ham radio have no desire for progress or change unless it is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00357.html (10,891 bytes)

284. Re: [CQ-Contest] Just one weekend (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:15:27 -0700
Everyone can do this each and every day. Nobody forces anyone to use Spots from anywhere, RBN or the old fashioned 2m spots or telnet. It is up to you to decided how you want to operate. What works f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00391.html (10,242 bytes)

285. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 07:34:17 -0700
I am glad you are not the Czar of radio contesting..... _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00404.html (13,897 bytes)

286. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:28:36 -0700
I can envision renting the PJ2T remote contest station, not having to drag a bunch of gear to a dx location and operate from my desk and saving the cost of airfare. Ok I won't get great warm vacation
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00427.html (9,679 bytes)

287. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:35:18 -0700
You would feel cheated if he told you he was remote but you would be fine if he did not? Ultimately you just said there is no difference. Why do you care where the operator is located? You get credit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00428.html (15,083 bytes)

288. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is the Cluster losing its Luster (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:26:39 -0700
I used my cluster W0MU-1, w0mu.net, shameless plug . Keep in mind that most clusters are all tied together so one bad spot will propagate to nearly every other spot outlet available. I have used the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00433.html (9,769 bytes)

289. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Oracle Spoke (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:38:57 -0700
I thought KC1XX was shown in a more recent picture doing something similar. It might not have been KC1XX but I think this is not all that uncommon. Fire departments find all sorts of uses for ladders
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00434.html (9,926 bytes)

290. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:09:51 -0700
A bit over dramatic Doug? Here are the ARRL DXCC rules. *9. All stations must be contacted*from the same DXCC entity. The location of any station shall be defined as the location of the transmitter.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00438.html (11,458 bytes)

291. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 13:30:40 -0700
Maybe those that no longer get enjoyment out of the hobby should move along. I happen to think it is just fine. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00015.html (10,475 bytes)

292. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest sleep assist (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 16:22:42 -0700
This is only allowed if ingested by RF though! :) W0MU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00018.html (9,839 bytes)

293. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 16:31:16 -0700
So the ARRL was wise enough to understand that DXCC is just an award. People move, technology changes and so have their rules. Apparently you have no problem penalizing people for having to move beca
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00020.html (11,958 bytes)

294. Re: [CQ-Contest] Two Single operators, one club call sign (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 08:58:31 -0700
I think what he was asking is if it was possible to run two single band entries using the same club callsign. I see many issues with this. I believe using separate calls is the only way to do this. _
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00065.html (11,218 bytes)

295. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA RTTY Sprint (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:36:10 -0700
No. What he means is just call CQ and not try to get in the piles if you are getting beat out all the time. I may try qrp again and that is about the only way to make contacts. Alternate cq's at leas
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00103.html (10,316 bytes)

296. Re: [CQ-Contest] SECRETS OF CONTESTING, CHAPTER 21 (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:27:25 -0600
This is all well and good and I went to the other site. So what? There seems to be lots of beating around the bush going on. Why not address this head on? What I have noticed in life is that things c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00135.html (15,102 bytes)

297. Re: [CQ-Contest] Throwing the Baby Out With the Bathwater (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:56:04 -0600
By making it harder for people to participate....participation will be low...........which is never a good thing. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00168.html (9,879 bytes)

298. Re: [CQ-Contest] Throwing the Baby Out With the Bathwater (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 21:43:38 -0600
Harder was a bad choice of words. It won't be hard for me at all as I probably won't make a single contact. Sponsors chase participants away with overly restrictive rules that are really created for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00172.html (12,035 bytes)

299. [CQ-Contest] Op needed: J6 Contest Dxpedition November 21 - Dec 1 2011 (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:51:24 -0600
W0MU and N1NK and their XYLS's are planning a trip to St. Lucia. We are planning on operating in the CQ WW CW contest. Operation outside the contest is up to each operator. We have rented the Chateau
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00222.html (7,287 bytes)

300. Re: [CQ-Contest] 275 km petition (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:28:30 -0600
How about providing possible solutions to issue. How would you solve this issue? What would be acceptable to you? Do you want the entire country to be allowed to submit scores? a 1000km radius? etc.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-04/msg00043.html (7,878 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu