Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w1tef@swsports.org: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1)
Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:40:29 -0400
Joe, Looking at that chart, it would appear that N1MM owns a huge portion of the contesting software being used. I don't believe that chart is truly representative of either N1MM or N3FJP. I know for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00244.html (9,316 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Time to ban logging software and return to paper (score: 1)
Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 11:28:32 -0400
Or Spam - let's not forget Spam. Tom, W1TEF _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00017.html (7,847 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Time to ban logging software and return to paper (score: 1)
Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 11:41:10 -0400
Stu, I contribute to the SCP - no reason not to. But I don't use it. And as I've said before, I don't use logging programs unless I'm in an environment in which you have to use a logging program. Nor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00019.html (9,625 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] p (score: 1)
Author: w1tef@swsports.org
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 17:33:20 -0600
And that is really the point - who should pay for it. To me, it is very much a non-issue. I have several CQ WW Region #1 awards for my meager 10 meter SSB/CW QRP efforts and I have received a few in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00242.html (10,377 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques (score: 1)
Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 22:02:43 -0400
Randy, What amazes me is that this same discussion was held almost 20 years ago - almost word for word. It was a big deal when K1EA started CT and the unique discussion dominated every DX/Contesting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00021.html (11,180 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] South Carolina QP 09/19/15 (score: 1)
Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:15:35 -0400
Greetings, *The Big Event* is quickly approaching and we're all getting our enthusiasm a tune up for 09/19/15. I am looking forward to it as we may have large numbers of participants - which would be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00168.html (7,907 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check # in SS (score: 1)
Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 21:02:23 -0400
What is the most efficient to use? If you would like an off hand, outside observer kind of response, 1 - I maintain that all CW Qs and exchange info be no faster than 25 WPM at all times. This would
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00067.html (7,990 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB "Go away DX only" (score: 1)
Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 13:28:33 -0400
I'm not a big SSB operator preferring CW, but you're right. I was going to handout a few Qs today just to help others out with an extra Q, but it seemed like every foreign op ignored the rule relying
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00160.html (10,995 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] When do we spot? Should it be required? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 22:17:24 -0400
Interesting comments Ed. I sat this one out for various reasons but I did watch the clusters for any DX that I maybe haven't worked or to fill in blank spots on my 5BDXCC totals. Just for laughs, I f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00185.html (12,380 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Establishing a contest within a contest (score: 1)
Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 18:54:43 -0500
I came late to this discussion (my bad), but it is done all the time in State QPs. For example, Kansas QP has an opportunity to do a clean sweep of 1X1 calls, Florida is the same, other QPs have litt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00215.html (9,846 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is this person a contester? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:34:17 -0500
Should be called the Ham commercial. Tom, W1TEF/4 Chuck W5PR check out this link http://www.ispot.tv/ad/AAvD/hum-by-verizon-your-car Stop at 0:12 (12 seconds in). Can you identify this QTH? For those
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00349.html (8,495 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Category hopping (score: 1)
Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 16:44:06 -0500
This is kind of CHEATING!. Maybe they did a mistake when posting to 3830. If not, Will be good to take a good action with this station and operators. This discourage others to post in 3830, this is v
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00133.html (9,900 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] High Rate Dual Radio CQing (score: 1)
Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 11:02:25 -0500
On 12/8/2015 7:46 PM, Stephen Bloom wrote: As for category shopping ...either decide it's cool or it isn't. If it is, arguing about the limts of it is pointless. Human nature being what it is ..espec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00297.html (9,782 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Tennessee QSO Party Results (score: 1)
Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 16:08:06 -0500
That was a nice elegant certificate and the stats breakdown with scores was a very nice touch. I liked it so much, I'm stealing the stats newsletter idea for the South Carolina QSO Party. <grin> Tom,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00007.html (7,807 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] South Carolina QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 16:19:40 -0500
Salutations, We've got something cookin' for "The Carolina Weekend", February 27-28, 2016. The SCQP & NCQP will be giving away an amazing Carolina Style BBQ Dinner with all the trimmings. To be eligi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00052.html (9,221 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it just me ? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:21:52 -0400
Sure - why not? An overlay doesn't mean you have to use it, it just is there in case you want to compete against other same class license holders. Then again, it would only pertain to the US so I'm n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00265.html (9,910 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Great book (score: 1)
Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 13:31:20 -0400
I just bought the Kindle addition and also recommend it. Very well written, informative and very interesting - one might even say it's suspense in an odd way. I also have no pecuniary interest in thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00048.html (7,985 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Q-signal (score: 1)
Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:34:24 -0400
While I like this idea, I would propose QYB - Quit Your Complaining... Tom, W1TEF Usage: "QRU (contest name) (region enjoying an advantage)" Meaning: "The (contest) is unfair because stations in (reg
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00149.html (8,818 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu