Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w7why@verizon.net: 247 ]

Total 247 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [CQ-Contest] Poison D' Avril (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 20:03:27 -0700
Hmmm, same thing here Bob. I got the message "All you losers can't submit a lot. Only log from K1DG will be accepted." Still think something fishy is going on. 73 Tom W7WHY Yaw-butt... MY log was rej
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-04/msg00029.html (9,564 bytes)

122. Re: [CQ-Contest] RST as a sync [was: cut #] (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:26:48 -0700
PS: Now that I'm thinking about it, I can imagine having a little more fun by giving the big gun's reports like "229" as a sort of "Revenge of the Little Pistol's", knowing that it breaks nothing, ex
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00040.html (8,421 bytes)

123. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut #'s (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:02:32 -0700
Hi Shelby You are right on there. I think sometimes op's have their CW (computer) speed set real slow even if they can copy much faster. I have never figured out why in the heck if I am sending at 35
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00114.html (8,928 bytes)

124. Re: [CQ-Contest] remember this? Russian Woodpecker (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 22:05:50 -0700
Boy,no wonder it was so loud here. I can remember when people used to say they pointed their antennas towards the site and send a bunch of dits on their keyer and stopped it. I think that would be a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00153.html (8,411 bytes)

125. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU - Join Us (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 19:31:50 -0700
Forty meters is actually the only band where RTTY and CW mingle. As people have said over and over again. some countries CAN'T work RTTY up high in the band on 40, that is why they congregate around
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00301.html (9,136 bytes)

126. Re: [CQ-Contest] A call to action (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 08:05:33 -0700
Hi Bill et al The participation in the last few RTTY contests has increased dramatically. I have worked a whole bunch of new 2 x 3 callsigns that have never been on before. This seems to say that the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00307.html (7,363 bytes)

127. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST contesting issue idea (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 08:59:05 -0700
Now, that is a good idea. I just started receiving NCJ and it sure has a lot more stuff I'm interested in than QST does. Hey Steve, bring it up an the next meeting :-) 73 Tom W7WHY __________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00309.html (9,068 bytes)

128. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest CQ format? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 13:55:37 -0700
Hi Dale I think that is a good way to do it. I acutally put "W7WHY <<<<<nst>>>>>" at the end. At least if someone tunes me in at the end of the CQ, they know I am CQ'ing. If I just send W7WHY, it's h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00315.html (7,974 bytes)

129. Re: [CQ-Contest] Certificate for the 10 Meter Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:05:32 -0700
Yeah, it's great ain't it!! Got 2 for the 2006 sweepstakes last week. Someone is on the ball!! 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00189.html (6,882 bytes)

130. [CQ-Contest] 160 meter contest windows (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:38:08 -0700
Hi All It seems as this summer is just flying by and pretty soon it will be contest time again (yay). It won't be long until we are in the midst of some 160 meter contests. And, as before, after the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00192.html (8,609 bytes)

131. Re: [CQ-Contest] NS Ladder The Final Week (score: 1)
Author: <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:09:37 -0500 (CDT)
Regardless of how the score turns out, it was neat to see K7NV on the cover of QST this month, doing what he does best. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00350.html (7,247 bytes)

132. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesters and LOTW (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:12:11 -0700
Hi All Yes, they do QSL very well. One thing I have wondered. I see that BS7H has already uploaded their logs. One thing that always got a good input of donations for the DX'peditions is the paper ca
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00055.html (7,128 bytes)

133. Re: [CQ-Contest] Pre-emptive QSLing - was:Contesters and LOTW (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:37:28 -0700
Bob, I have to dissagree with you on this one. I positivily hate those emails with the smiley kittens, rays of sunshine, smiley faces, etc in the background. Dunno what they are trying to prove with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00116.html (8,499 bytes)

134. Re: [CQ-Contest] A3S or TH-3JRS or ELSE? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:24:59 -0700
Hi Alex Have you considered the Hy Gain TH-2? It is the same price as the TH-3jr but you can run 2 kw into it. I had a TH-3Jr here once upon a time and I blew the traps by accidently loading the amp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00214.html (8,294 bytes)

135. [CQ-Contest] SO2R in the sprint's (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 16:16:59 -0700
Hi All I was wondering what the general consensus is in doing SO2R in the sprints. I would imagine that the top level scorers did SO2R, and I was thinking about doing it, but what is the best sceneri
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00097.html (7,539 bytes)

136. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO R or not 2R? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:32:20 -0700
Hi Warren There is--every week on Thursday night at 0200 and 0230. From 0200 to 0230 is the slow speed practice, around 20 wpm, and from 0230 to 0300 we let 'er rip :-). The NCCC has the Sprint Ladde
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00181.html (8,959 bytes)

137. Re: [CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:05:26 -0700
Hi Steve Where would you recommend? 7090 up in the DX SSB portion of the band? That would work good if you could get all the countries that CAN'T work RTTY up there to change their rules and regulalt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00028.html (9,479 bytes)

138. Re: [CQ-Contest] 80 meter CQWW SSB Question (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:54:47 -0700
Hi Steve I think I'd still hang around 3.750 as it will be a while before guys start moving wayway down the band. It seems to me that working down around 3.600 would actually be better because you co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00092.html (7,452 bytes)

139. Re: [CQ-Contest] contest challenge (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:14:01 -0700
Or in my case, put it there for all to laugh at :-) 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00314.html (7,083 bytes)

140. Re: [CQ-Contest] (Bad) Contest Haiku (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:02:38 -0700
Computer locks up on 20 Have to run low power Too much QRM Nobody hears me Can work fifteen with amp But only dipole there Africans hear me Today is a good day Maybe good Haiku? Tom W7WHY ___________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00374.html (8,045 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu