Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w9sz.zack@gmail.com: 360 ]

Total 360 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] For those who wonder what happenned this weekend (score: 1)
Author: "Zack Widup" <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:03:40 -0600
You mean we have another YEAR of low SSN coming? UGH!! 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00061.html (7,883 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] The contest is over (score: 1)
Author: "Zack Widup" <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:49:35 -0600
It's those unusual prefixes that throw people sometimes, when they are unexpected. I knew 5K0T was active from Serrana Bank and was excited to see they were actually in the contest. I did hear them s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00111.html (8,221 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "Zack Widup" <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 10:12:22 -0600
Not to mention the fact these calls spell out FOCUS, WILL, HIHA, CLEAR. 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00113.html (8,447 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] The contest is over (score: 1)
Author: "Zack Widup" <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 08:50:12 -0600
Don't assume that someone calling someone else a minute after the contest is trying to make a contest QSO. I think I sent an e-mail earlier outlining my attempt to work a station signing XX9A a minut
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00141.html (9,011 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal report (score: 1)
Author: "Zack Widup" <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:32:09 -0600
That's one thing I like about SS, VHF contests, NAQP etc. which do not have a "signal report" as part of their exchange. The exchange is usually something you actually have to copy. I may know what g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00341.html (11,449 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal Report (score: 1)
Author: "Zack Widup" <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:14:15 -0600
I think such a contest would be great fun myself! 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00352.html (8,834 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] WARC Band Contests (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:40:56 -0600
I have always tried to be courteous to those who aren't contesters. A majority of hams aren't contesters and many feel at the least "irked" by the bands being wiped out for them on weekends when ther
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00078.html (8,168 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:41:53 -0600
Then why do I get so many SWL cards every year for QSO's I made in the ARRL DX contest? (Sorry, I couldn't resist!) 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00194.html (9,868 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dx peditions and contests (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:03:14 -0600
Yes, that's right. I remember that. I think that was before 1X1 calls became used (1993). I might be wrong. 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00275.html (10,849 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Newbie CW logging questions (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:04:56 -0600
My answers below. That's what I do - never had a problem with it being rejected. 2) If a DX station sends "K" as their power, do I log K or KW? I've ususlly logged it as KW. 3) If a DX station sends
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00332.html (8,683 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] No US DX Only - ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:09:38 -0600
Quite a few US ops when called by US/Canadian stations in ARRL DX will work them just to get them to stop calling, then save the entire log but delete all those QSO's in the log submission to ARRL. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00349.html (10,807 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] K5D in ARRL CW = it WAS them (real) (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:30:06 -0600
Neither of the sites I know of - http://www.kp5.us http://www.logsearch.de give you a day. They just give a band/mode. It looks like you have two QSO's on 40 CW in the log. Did they give you a contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00367.html (8,069 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] 3X6A (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:32:25 -0600
Reminds me of working 4S7AX some years ago in CQWW CW, I think. Beam heading was right, but it could've been a JA fooling around. Never was able to find anything on him anywhere. 73, Zack W9SZ ______
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00373.html (7,232 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] 3X6A (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:46:48 -0600
Reminds me of the infamous 4Q2LID that occasionally made an appearance on the air. Is K9VV on this reflector? 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00395.html (8,528 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Call Area Question for Awards (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:09:03 -0600
Hmm ... I didn't participate in that contest, but I use CT and it always asks me to enter my address and then it puts that in the Cabrillo log file. I would assume they would go by the address you ga
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00398.html (10,397 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] ETHICS (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 14:00:30 -0500
Well, in one case you know at once that NO station from the USA can validly operate there. In the other case, some US stations can validly operate there, so you leave that up to them as to whether th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00053.html (11,344 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Second Century of Radio (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 08:45:12 -0500
Sorry, I'm a RADIO amateur. I'm into RADIOsport, So I, for one, won't be in anyone's logs in those contests. 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00241.html (9,776 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Second Century of Radio (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:31:38 -0500
Lack of sunspots? _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00261.html (8,629 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 13:41:21 -0500
I believe so as long as the person stays within his or her own license's operating privileges (e.g. WD9@@@ as an Advanced class licensee cannot use W9SZ in the Extra parts of the band.) I don't know
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00116.html (10,211 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Borrowing Callsigns (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:21:33 -0500
I guess that brings up an interesting question regarding Field Day. If you are entering in, for instance, the 5A category using a callsign issued to an Extra-class station and there is one Extra clas
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00124.html (9,943 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu