Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w9wi@w9wi.com: 59 ]

Total 59 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] "?" not equal to "QRL?" (score: 1)
Author: <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:32:56 -0400
Of course, even "CQ N5EE" is significantly longer than "QRL?". The other issue that comes up when you do it this way is... what happens if someone answers your quick CQ? - isn't your caller likely to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00123.html (9,921 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] "?" not equal to "QRL?" (score: 1)
Author: <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 06:02:44 -0400
One thing I think we should keep in mind is the possibility the person who's using the frequency is NOT a contester. I would imagine most of us would respond to pretty much anything that got transmit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00128.html (9,549 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes: Should I bepenalized forgettingmylicense in 20... (score: 1)
Author: <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 22:32:36 -0500
You'd be surprised how little good that would do. == Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View, TN EM66 first licensed in November 1973 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00328.html (7,356 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 20:00:58 -0500
I *think* I've successfully run Procomm Plus/DOS under Windows XP. The difference, however, is that PC+ uses the COM ports the way they were intended. Handshaking leads were used only for handshaking
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00104.html (8,442 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Plea to Cabrillo Contet Robot Writers (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: 10 Jan 2007 00:55:02 -0600
Cabrillo is MUCH easier to parse than either ADIF or XML. Especially for Novice programmers -- and for those trying to read the files without a computer. (seriously, you can print a Cabrillo file & t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00143.html (8,951 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Plea to Cabrillo Contet Robot Writers (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: 10 Jan 2007 12:37:45 -0600
I would respectfully disagree... Now, I'm not saying XML is necessarily *hard* to parse visually. It could, after all, be a termcap file<grin>! It would seem to me a consistent location of the charac
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00148.html (10,997 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1)
Author: <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:34:19 -0500
MOST interesting. (and disappointing) Strangely enough, I've *never* received an email of that type. Despite having operated a couple of contests in the last year with exchanges that won't match the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00258.html (8,208 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Selection Criteria (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:55:01 -0600
Within a geographically large country (USA, Russia, Canada, Australia, China, others?) would there be a point in using a semi-democratic or jury kind of process? Something like this: - WRTC organizer
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00520.html (11,221 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet debate (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:16:09 -0500
Yep, and this is why I think there's no need to restrict use of remote receivers. A rule restricting all transmitters operating on the contest bands to a 500m circle would IMHO be adequate. -- Doug S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00246.html (7,678 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet debate (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:42:57 -0500
OK, so you turn on your remote receiver in Australia, and hear YB0XYZ blasting in on 7015KHz. So you turn on your transmitter - 100w and indoor antenna in New England - and call the YB0. Really think
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00255.html (8,555 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] K4JNY/W4PA superstation for sale .... whole orin parts (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:31:43 -0500
FWIW, if you worked W1AW/4 in IARU last summer on 40CW, 20SSB, or 15SSB then you worked Jeff's station. -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View, TN EM66 _______________________________________________ CQ-Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-04/msg00197.html (7,766 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] Riddle Me this... BS7H (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 10:13:30 -0500
Probably likewise, but... - Often, there is nowhere to QSY. (hard to imagine this being the case in JIDX but in some other contests, certainly) - If we insist that the 14237 Daily Disease Discussion
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00031.html (9,030 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] Circle Jerks (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 00:32:27 -0500
Do they have to be contiguous? -- (I want CN85tj, DM03wv, DM79cf, EK99hg, EM66kj, EN44hw, EN53ll, FK42xm, FM19jd, FN03bm, FN21ok, FN31be, FN42ev, IN94tr, and KO00hv) -- I wonder how many contesters k
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00306.html (8,667 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] Circle Jerks (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:35:27 -0500
I don't know that the circle process *does* offer an advantage to clubs in the middle of the country. Population density varies wildly from one part of the country to another. A circle of 175-miles r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00350.html (9,525 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] Circle Jerks (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 00:46:11 -0500
I do wonder if it's possible this is because of clubs not being formed because the potential members knew they wouldn't be able to participate in club competition? -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View, T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00381.html (9,689 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (slovenly or not) (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 08:22:02 -0500
And that *can* work fairly well, but merely being able to copy multiple signals through the QRM doesn't help that much if the *other guy* doesn't have the same ability... -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00059.html (7,653 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] Jay Seven Oh Jay - so...are you changing your log? (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:32:36 -0500
Bill wrote "...re-write the log sheets in order to make the log entries readable...". I don't see anything there that states, or suggests, using any source of information except what's already in the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00371.html (8,918 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW and 0 pointers (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 09:12:13 -0500
I would suggest it should be possible to do a simple statistical analysis & determine whether a particular entrant isn't logging zero pointers. Say, on average, for every 1,000 QSOs claimed by an ent
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00116.html (7,933 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fw: Skimmer as technology (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:01:09 -0600
I'm way too young to have seen it firsthand but from my reading, I always thought it meant "raw" AC. What's the point of rectifying it if you're not using a filter? Can't you just put the raw AC on t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00185.html (8,690 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu