Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wn3vaw@verizon.net: 729 ]

Total 729 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reporting Jammers to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:22:21 -0500
Mike, Having had to personally deal with Riley on some issues a few years ago, I can assure that the problem is well in hand. It may take some time... the FCC is a government bureaucracy, after all,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00209.html (10,820 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:45:35 -0500
Steve, Interesting question. But the next question I would ask is "was there a SIGNAL on the air alleging to be XY8Z on the air at that time?" Sad to say, we have a tiny group of jokers who love to p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00293.html (11,403 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:28:02 -0500
A good sports analogy? Well... Many marathons, 10 K races, and so forth have hundreds if not thousands of participants. But look closer... there is usually an "elite" group of runners seriously compe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00423.html (13,448 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:22:37 -0500
One year during the Pa QSO Party, back in the Jurassic era... er, circa 1980... a couple of us at the Penn State club station ran K3CR multi/multi. One station dedicated SSB, one CW. We probably woul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00461.html (10,875 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] R: QRP - Get Over ItS (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 16:24:15 -0500
I see both Bill's point and Rag's point. And because of my prefix, I tend to get a lot of cards too. So I've tried to adapt the following "rules" to how I handle QSL cards... Incoming Cards: 1. Direc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00096.html (10,778 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] R: QRP - Get Over It (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 21:21:02 -0500
Boris, Let's be clear that LotW confirmations only cost a fee when the person who has RECEIVED the confirmation applies for an award; there remains NO charge to upload or view a log. And yes, when ad
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00098.html (9,304 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Trying to compile list of all known Cabrillo contestIDs (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 23:32:19 -0500
Hmmm... Brett, I understand where you're coming from. But let me put it to you this way: Suppose, for the sake of argument, my local 10 meter club decides to sponsor a new 10 meter contest in the spr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00150.html (15,234 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Dx-qsl] QSL Info Needed (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:40:06 -0500
If anyone is interested in reading W9UK / VP2MUK's write-up on last month's VP2M DXpedition (which included the VP2MVX operation in the ARRL DX CW), you can find it in this month's issue of the WASHR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00137.html (7,710 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] Stunning Upset in Poisson D'Avril (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 14:39:22 -0400
Sorry Ken, not so fast. You forgot to mention that April F0OL (also FO0L) was QRV from San Serriffe. Those of you who get The Daily DX will have seen the announcement that was sent out yesterday by B
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00015.html (9,029 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST Contest Results (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius WN3VAW <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:21:02 -0500 (CDT)
Like Jim, I couldn't tell you the last time I saw QST on a magazine rack at a magazine/bookstore or in the magazine aisle of a supermarket. And I do see CQ, but it's sporadic. There are reasons why,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00183.html (11,074 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST Contest Results (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 21:49:24 -0400
I should have added in my earlier reply that while I would like to see contest results back in QST, I would be willing to settle for another in-print venue... and the NCJ seems tailor-made for that p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-05/msg00191.html (10,511 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] Montenegro - a new Ham country? (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius WN3VAW <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 09:45:08 -0500 (CDT)
Tim, I believe they've set a target date of or or about 13 July to declare Montenegro independant. I would expect that the ITU will, in due course, issue them a new prefix block, unless as part of th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00040.html (8,758 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] Uniques (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:12:30 -0500 (CDT)
I have to agree in principle with AA6DX. There have been more than a few contests over the years where I simply didn't have time to commit more than a few hours, if that much, and made only a small a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00321.html (10,858 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] A proposal (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:13:13 -0500 (CDT)
Oh boy, I can just see the flames now... Jim, the short answer is that: (a) There is no LEGAL restriction preventing a contest on the WARC bands, but (b) Accepted VOLUNTARY amateur practice has been
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00628.html (11,671 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technique (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 11:27:58 -0500 (CDT)
But at what point do you "lose" the frequency when you jump to the other rig? I will agree that if you're making a quick (stress: "quick") jump back & forth, especially on CW at a decent speed, you p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00073.html (12,899 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Technique (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 07:25:29 -0400
Depends on the exact exchange, which is very truncated in the example below. If it's unconditional? No, probably not. If it's conditional? Probably. (Although "obligated" might be too strong a word).
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00084.html (10,229 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] "?" not equal to "QRL?" (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:40:37 -0500 (CDT)
I think you're both right on target here. My issue remains, though, when you THINK you've found a clear frequency, have made a few CQ's and even a few QSO's, and then havd someone show up and demand
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00112.html (12,723 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest reports and awards (DXCC etc) (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:54:12 -0400
Now there's some irony for you. Contest logs (at least for ARRL contests) were acceptable for DXCC credit way back in the "golden age" (1945 - mid '60's), a practice I understand was discontinued som
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00219.html (10,586 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] A proposal (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 02:07:54 -0400
Why is this being dredging up again after over a month? How are 17 and 12m any narrower than the 40m band in Region 2? Actually, there are still some parts of 30m that are shared with the Fixed servi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00015.html (8,211 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] f/B Antenna ratios - reception (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:03:20 -0500 (CDT)
Ahhh, indeed. Memories: Sometime circa 1979-1980 time frame, a couple of us at the Penn State ARC K3CR realized that with not much effort, we stood a good chance of winning Multi-Op WPA for the ARRL
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00028.html (10,338 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu