Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[WRTC2010\]\s+RRTC\-2008\s+scores\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[WRTC2010\]\s+RRTC\-2008\s+scores\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] [WRTC2010] RRTC-2008 scores (score: 1): Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:56:37 +0200; Ionosphere was also not in your favor! R33 CW signals were barely above noise level. Skimmer detected only one in five hours. Great ops! I wish you better luck in two years. 73 de Mario, S56A _______; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00137.html (7,436 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] [WRTC2010] RRTC-2008 scores (score: 1): Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:17:58 +0200; 20m signals from RRTC stations were pretty loud here. 15m only open for the first two hours, in which I worked a few R33s there. Later I was often asked for QSY to 15m (and even 10m) -- always tried; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00139.html (7,921 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] [WRTC2010] RRTC-2008 scores (score: 1): Author: Igor Booklan SRR <ra3auu@srr.ru>; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:05:19 +0400; Fabian, Thanks for the report. I agree with Mario that propagation wasn't there, it was also washed away by rain, so the guys mostly used 20 and 40. 15 and 10 were dead bands with some very short ope; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00141.html (8,600 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]