Fabian,
Thanks for the report. I agree with Mario that propagation wasn't
there, it was also washed away by rain, so the guys mostly used
20 and 40. 15 and 10 were dead bands with some very short openings.
I don't have all the calls here with me but I promise that we will
extend results table with all the R33 calls within few days.
73s, Harry RA3AUU
FK> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 07:56:37PM +0200, Marijan Miletic wrote:
>> Ionosphere was also not in your favor! R33 CW signals were barely above
>> noise level. Skimmer detected only one in five hours.
FK> 20m signals from RRTC stations were pretty loud here. 15m only open
FK> for the first two hours, in which I worked a few R33s there. Later I
FK> was often asked for QSY to 15m (and even 10m) -- always tried but it
FK> never worked.
FK> 40m signals were mostly at the noise edge here, but most operators had
FK> good ears.
FK> It was fun to watch the scores online and guess who is who. Looks like
FK> there is no list of the callsigns used in the contest yet?
FK> 73,
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|