Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+contest\s+coverage\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+contest\s+coverage\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ARRL contest coverage (score: 1): Author: mwilson@arrl.org (Wilson, Mark K1RO); Date: Wed Jan 9 16:39:23 2002; We're talking about expanding contest coverage using a combination of the ARRL Web site and QST. We're not talking about eliminating coverage of contests in QST. What we are proposing is publishing c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00137.html (13,875 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] ARRL contest coverage (score: 1): Author: ab0mv@ix.netcom.com (ab0mv@ix.netcom.com); Date: Wed Jan 9 17:15:36 2002; In regards to your posting on CQ Contest: I have been an ARRL member since 1996 or 1997. I have never received any survey about my interests in ham radio/QST. Neither have any of my friends in NC or; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00138.html (8,815 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] ARRL contest coverage (score: 1): Author: wk6i@twistedoak.com (Jeff Stai WK6I); Date: Wed Jan 9 15:00:55 2002; hi Mark - I appreciate you taking the time to explain your position in detail. But I would like to make a point about who reads contest results. It's not about ads and radios, it's about people and f; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00141.html (9,947 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] ARRL contest coverage (score: 1): Author: mwilson@arrl.org (Wilson, Mark K1RO); Date: Wed Jan 9 18:02:06 2002; Hello Merri: We conduct comprehensive, professional QST reader surveys approximately every three years, using Readex, Inc., a firm that specializes in magazine readership research. The surveys are co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00142.html (8,338 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] ARRL contest coverage (score: 1): Author: dennis.mcalpine@verizon.net (Dennis McAlpine); Date: Wed Jan 9 20:39:11 2002; Mark, I think you made a very rational, reasoned argument for moving scores, rules, etc. to the Internet in return for a better edtorial content regarding contests and more analysis. If that indeed w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00149.html (11,053 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] ARRL contest coverage (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Wed Jan 9 22:48:01 2002; Of all the anayses I've read today, I fear that K2SX has it closest to right. Mark no doubt intends to carry through both on the web data improvements and the expanded non-results coverage in QST, bu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00155.html (9,533 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] ARRL contest coverage (score: 1): Author: Jpdalt@aol.com (Jpdalt@aol.com); Date: Thu Jan 10 11:50:37 2002; How about posting a QST survey on the ARRL web site? If you want only responses from members, put it in the Members Only section. Jim, KZ1M. -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-cont; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00167.html (8,282 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] ARRL contest coverage (score: 1): Author: mwilson@arrl.org (Wilson, Mark K1RO); Date: Thu Jan 10 12:58:33 2002; Jim, the problem with a poll on the Web site is that you only hear from those people who happened to be visiting that area of the Web site while the poll is active and care enough (one way or the ot; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00171.html (9,519 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] ARRL contest coverage (score: 1): Author: k3ft@erols.com (Chuck K3FT); Date: Thu Jan 10 21:05:51 2002; This message appeared on the contesting.com reflector from Mark Wilson of the ARRL. FYI, My message back to him then his message. 73 Chuck K3FT -- Mark, Thanks for the info. I must offer a small rebu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00177.html (12,005 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] ARRL contest coverage (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Thu Jan 10 21:27:05 2002; Mark, if you have that level of confidence in the ARRL's survey results, how about publicly disclosing the sample size, the questions asked, the methodology used and the results obtained? A little tr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00178.html (8,815 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] ARRL contest coverage (score: 1): Author: wk6i@twistedoak.com (Jeff Stai WK6I); Date: Thu Jan 10 18:43:00 2002; One should also note that a survey is only as good as the questions asked. For example, when asked to compare different topics, it wouldn't surprise me if most hams rank their interest in public serv; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00180.html (9,579 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] ARRL contest coverage (score: 1): Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup); Date: Fri Jan 11 08:38:36 2002; The only thing I can see wrong with the website survey is that some members aren't on Internet. Maybe it should be announced in the front pages QST that a survey is being done at the website. This ma; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00199.html (9,181 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] ARRL contest coverage (score: 1): Author: k6xx@juno.com (Bob Wolbert); Date: Fri Jan 11 10:36:47 2002; Mark, This "problem" is easily solved. Announce the survey in the ARRL Letter! Those who care will respond. Those who don't care shouldn't matter! 73 de Bob, K6XX 73 de Bob, K6XX k6xx@arrl.net www.k6; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00216.html (10,120 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]