Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Cheating\s+again\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Cheating again............. (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Rogozinski" <trogo@telegraphy.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:51:03 -0400
I think its absolutely disgusting that the contest community has to be so concerned with cheating the discussion just goes on and on and on. For a damned certificate no less. My God what has this wor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00125.html (7,631 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating again............. (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:37:02 -0500
Well I guess I must get in my .02 c worth, Why doesn't someone set up a Yahoo Group for all this CHEATERS B.S. its getting to be a bit much, this is supposed to be a CQ-CONTEST reflector not a CHEATE
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00137.html (9,712 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating again............. (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Rogozinski" <trogo@telegraphy.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 14:38:44 -0400
I agree - they need to get tough on those who cheat - identify them and band them for life. Or SHUT UP! The contest sponsors bear the responsibility of the ban but the participants can help identify
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00138.html (10,436 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating again............. (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 18:07:13 -0400
This discussion has no end. It cannot possibly resolve. It will stop when all are weary and tired of reading about it. One side of this discussion always has to be held in tension with the other. Nei
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00141.html (8,081 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating again............. (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 10:00:23 -0500
Not to bring the debate here, but my question about "true north" is "How accurate do you need to be?" A 2 foot diameter dish at 10 GHz has a lot narrower beamwidth than anything on HF, and my trusty
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00148.html (8,943 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating again............. (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 01:37:31 -0400
That's the thing...the discussions just went on and on and on and on and on and on. You can look it up in the archives. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00151.html (10,081 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating again............. (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:59:12 -0500
True North is easy !! Its on the Top or bottom between East and West IF you can find East and West. Rex -- Original Message -- From: "Guy Olinger K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net> To: "Zack Widup" <w9sz.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00154.html (11,454 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu