Hello, after reviewing the discussions and the criticism we received from contesters worldwide, we had an internal discussion and decided the following changes. We will split the Single Operator cate
Author: K4XS via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:10:27 -0500
I usually operate assisted. Thanks to the committee for listening to the contesters and doing the right thing. K4XS In a message dated 12/18/2014 2:55:10 P.M. Coordinated Universal Tim, dl1mgb@wrtc20
Congratulations for making the change. This measurably enhances the prestige of the WRTC2018 organization and better balances the qualification factors. 73, Dave K3ZJ ________________________________
Great! Thanks. Gedas LY9A Hello, after reviewing the discussions and the criticism we received from contesters worldwide, we had an internal discussion and decided the following changes. We will spli
Chris, As one who criticised your committees decision to merge the assisted and unassisted classes for single ops on this Forum, I applaud your decision to now reverse that.decision - thank you. Whi
I realize that the change is described as "final", but I'll offer a thought (since I've managed to be quiet so far). First, it should be noted that I'm probably not going to be in the running for a W
Brian you are probably wrong, First of all there are no solid statistics on cheating. Second, packet abuse is the cheapest way of chesting. Third, you can tell by the red cards in several contests, m
I also thank Chris and the committee for reconsidering. 0.9 is better than nothing, though I would have wished for 0.8 with reference to the fact that WAE, RDXC and AA already have Assisted as the on
Martin, I would challenge you and claim that Brian is very correct on his statement about power cheating. You are correct about lack of solid statistics on cheating. The same applies to sports and do
Hi Chris, you just made the best part of your previous planning obsolete in my eyes. You dared to do something new. Against the idea of a lot of other people who for whatever reason were trying to ma
Dear Chris, nice that you consider our opinions. Intention is not to criticize. On the contrary, we all want to help you to make rules to be as good as possible, and I am sure - it is our common inte
Dear Ranko, Some of us have explained and given our reasons as to why we don't think this change is a step forward. So far, those who believe this is a step forward, mainly state their reason why bei
Hi Martin and Frank, I really appreciate different opinions, and will answers you as simple as possible. I do not thing that difference Unassisted vs Assisted is step forward in contesting. It is jus