Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+Duration\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+Duration\s*$/: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:36:49 +0400; Hi Rick, I agree with you I think if CQ WW and ARRL contest will have category lets say 40 hours or 38 hours additionally to 48 I think that might be quite popular category and many contesters will p; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00934.html (12,537 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:55:00 EDT; In a message dated 7/21/05 9:58:38 PM Greenwich Standard Time, dx35@hilding.com writes: Certainly, we have to admire and respect those like N6TJ, K5TR, W2SC, et.al. who can still do the full 48 hours; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00941.html (8,833 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: "py2ny" <py2ny@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 22:20:14 -0300; Would like to have all contests with 24 or maybe 36 hours maximum... Best 73 to all Vitor L Aidar Santos, PY2NY (py2ny@arrl.net) Caixa Postal 204 Jaboticabal, SP 14870-970 - Brasil -- Original Messag; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00948.html (10,842 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:37:08 -0700; Thank you for your supportive comments, Alex, especially as one who does 48 hours in many contests and wins #1 positions! It is obvious that you understand how such a less-hour duration category (for; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00952.html (10,870 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:57:37 -0700; What I am advocating, along with others, is that "former" greyhounds (now on 3 legs), be allowed to still run competitively with the other 3-legged "greyhounds", but in a "3-legged Greyhound Category; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00954.html (8,829 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: mike l dormann <w7dra@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:19:31 -0700; i would like to see less overlapping contests, and more incentive to operate unused bands and modes (ie OCDX QSO points: 20 points/160m, 1 point/20m), timely result publishing, less bone crushing (10; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00956.html (8,907 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:21:55 -0000; Although I have been a shorter-duraction contest supporter for a long time, I do not believe a part-time category is a good idea. There are so many categories now, it would just dilute the box scores; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00961.html (10,272 bytes)
28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: "PY2NY - Vitor" <py2ny@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 11:49:36 -0300; All right... In a 36/24 hours class, even inside 48 hours contest, I would change my last 4 years 20m effort for All Bands participation, doing more and giving more contacts to everyone... - py2ny 0-; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00969.html (13,346 bytes)
29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:59:14 -0700; The contest sponsors and admins are already complete booked just trying to keep the contests running as-is. They need more categories like a hole in the head - which they already must feel that they; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00971.html (10,160 bytes)
30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 16:17:15 -0000; A 36 hour SOAB category within the big 48 hour events seems like a good idea to me. This would provide an opportunity for many more to compete rather than merely participate. As we all know, competit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00972.html (9,970 bytes)
31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: "wd0t" <tdravland@pie.midco.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 12:53:11 -0500; This discussion reminds me of the "Champions Tour" in golf, shorter courses but the same good competition, and if you want to play the regular tour (full length contest) , go for it. idea in seemed (; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00974.html (11,037 bytes)
32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: Sherman Banks <w4atl@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:44:54 -0400; Think of contest duration this way. I run road races for fun. So do a lot of other people. I have no way of winning these road races. In fact, there is only one winner and some age group winners. But; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00991.html (8,893 bytes)
33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:48:41 -0700; _________________________________________________ Deep down inside everyone wants to win. Many of us know that won't happen given our current location/equipment/whatever, but we have that tiny spark; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00996.html (9,324 bytes)
34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:49:33 -0700; You have nicely clarified the precise benefits to all participants that AL, 4L5A/D4B and I mentioned. Thank You. Mr. Wardster, N0AX, commented: Methinks the contest sponsors and admins need to FULLY; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01020.html (10,685 bytes)
35. [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: <ku8e@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:04:33 -0400; Remember years ago when the ARRL DX had the low band (160/80/40) and high band (20/15/10) categories ???? It would be neat to see those categories make a comeback. Doing a single band effort can be f; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01037.html (7,296 bytes)
36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:23:02 -0400; Jeff KU8E wrote: "I think many times (myself included) we chose to do a single band effort because we don't have the time or stamina to do a whole 48 hours. That takes QSO's away from those that we d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01051.html (7,265 bytes)
37. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 07:50:13 -0400; And I believe, when this was suggested several months ago, I suggested it should just be High/Low band, but perhaps, any three bands. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not wit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00240.html (7,926 bytes)
38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1): Author: "Bob Naumann - W5OV" <w5ov@w5ov.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:02:16 -0500; While I don't have any objection to the addition of these categories to the contest, I just wanted to point out that there is no restriction on single band entries from making QSOs on other bands - a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00241.html (8,691 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 38
Page: [1] [2]