Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Fewer\s+than\s+3\%\s+of\s+contesters\s+self\-spotted\s+in\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+CW\s+2024\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Fewer than 3% of contesters self-spotted in ARRL DX CW 2024 (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 11:02:17 -0500
I gathered manual (non-reversebeacon) spots from 9 Telnet cluster nodes around the world over the 48-hour ARRL DX CW 2024 contest, deduped them, and counted self-spots to see how widely self-spotting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00109.html (9,413 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fewer than 3% of contesters self-spotted in ARRL DX CW 2024 (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 14:32:44 -0600
You should do this test in a Phone contest. I bet the results would be very different. In a CW test I do not see any need to self spot at all. I mean each CQ most likely will be caught by the RBN, an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00111.html (10,168 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fewer than 3% of contesters self-spotted in ARRL DX CW 2024 (score: 1)
Author: Saulius Zalnerauskas <ly5w.sam@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 22:45:47 +0200
Joe (WB9SBD) I thought same as you, but I tried to do selfspot and found how much it helps. Not very much old fashioned dudies using RBN telnet spots. They just looking to DX summit :) Really! Sam LY
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00112.html (12,391 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fewer than 3% of contesters self-spotted in ARRL DX CW 2024 (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish <k1ep.list@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 17:15:24 -0500
Yes, there is a need for self spot. Not everyone uses a skimmer based cluster or has skimmer turned off. Or there are stations that call CQ in a manner that isn't picked up by skimmers. Therefore, so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00114.html (12,438 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fewer than 3% of contesters self-spotted in ARRL DX CW 2024 (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:47:10 +0000
I will echo that, as soon as I started running, I could see I was spotted by RBN in the INFO window of N1MM......and got some callers....BUT.....when I got a manual spot on the old school network, it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00115.html (13,117 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fewer than 3% of contesters self-spotted in ARRL DX CW 2024 (score: 1)
Author: PY2NY <py2ny.vitor@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:16:55 -0300
Hi there !! No self-spots here, no DX-Summit, no cluster, no-assisted. And was fine to me. Ok, now we have the SSB portion, and will be different. I don't know if I will keep myself out of the world,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00116.html (16,683 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Fewer than 3% of contesters self-spotted in ARRL DX CW 2024 (score: 1)
Author: Jim Smith <ars.kk0u@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:57:07 -0600
I disagree. We self-spotted at N0AX, and I didn't really start using it until Sunday afternoon local time, when things started to dry up while running. I self-spotted about every 15 minutes, and each
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00117.html (9,060 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fewer than 3% of contesters self-spotted in ARRL DX CW 2024 (score: 1)
Author: Barry Jacobson <bdj@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 18:03:31 -0500
Hi Jamie, I apologize, but know nothing about spotting, at all. What is the difference between RBN and "Old School Network"? I am familiar with RBN because I use it to check my signal strength when c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00120.html (15,987 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fewer than 3% of contesters self-spotted in ARRL DX CW 2024 (score: 1)
Author: WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:35:19 +0000
**FULL DISCLOSURE** I am far from what most would consider an expert......this is what works for me.... well, the old school, as I call it it, is no skimmer or rbn spots......just humans posting what
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00121.html (18,530 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fewer than 3% of contesters self-spotted in ARRL DX CW 2024 (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:41:13 -0500
Hi Barry - the difference is that the traditional cluster network relied on spots sent manually by individual stations also connected to a cluster.  The RBN, on the other hand, is over 200 nodes worl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00122.html (16,136 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu