Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Flex\s+radios\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Flex\s+radios\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: Bill via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 10:07:36 -0400; At the hamfest last weekend I had some extra time Sunday and wandered over to the Flex radio site. and had a long sit down with one of the reps. I did a hands on with the 6500 and was truly impressed; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00141.html (7,218 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 12:30:58 -0400; Hi Bill, The 6500 is a discontinued model. It is replaced by the 6600. The 6600 will do SO2R in a single box and has the new preselectors with 50dB of isolation between SCUs (an SCU is a flex term fo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00143.html (8,691 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: <w5prchuck@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 12:37:01 -0500; Hi, Bill, You will need the 6700 to do so2r with one radio You cannot receive on the 6500 while transmitting. I made that mistake and bought the 6500. It was ok for awhile because I was single band.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00145.html (8,729 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: <w5prchuck@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 12:38:37 -0500; They are still selling the 6700 Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Hi Bill, The 6500 is a discontinued model. It is replaced by the 6600. The 6600 will do SO2R in a single box and has the new preselectors; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00146.html (9,746 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 13:18:00 -0500; http://www.flexradio.com/amateur-products/flex-6000-signature-series/flex-6700/ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesti; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00148.html (11,557 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 15:56:58 -0400; Hi Chuck, The new 6600 (announced @Xenia) will also do SO2R as well. It also has 50dB preselectors so less reliance on bandpass filters to filter out nearby strong signals. The key is that it has two; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00150.html (10,548 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: Mike Kasrich <aj9c@indy.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 15:57:41 -0400; I have a 6500 and placed a deposit on the 6600 because of the SO2R capability. Originally I had a 6300 and a K3 in shack so I could compare side by side. Both are good rigs to have. With the Flex I w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00151.html (10,982 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 16:43:35 -0400; Chuck, and all: The new 6600 which replaced the 6500, and unlike the it 6500 has TWO spectral capture units so it probably can do SO2R --Mike, WV2ZOW _______________________________________________ C; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00152.html (10,677 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 15:09:03 -0500; This is quite interesting. Makes me think what are people kin K9CT doing and others that are using flex's that this one Field Day site did not do when I got this comment a while ago, There is a case; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00153.html (12,503 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 22:18:35 -0400; Bill, I just SOLD my 6700 and Maestro and have ZERO regrets. I had the combination for 16 months and the rig was only able to finish ONE contest without needing to be replaced in the heat of battle.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00161.html (10,256 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: Mike/W5JR <w5jr.lists@att.net>; Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 01:31:02 -0400; I believe nearly all multi op stations, whether M/S, M/2 or M/M, are using some combination of external bandpass filters along to reduce overload along with stubs to knock down harmonic specific sign; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00162.html (15,473 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 12:30:51 +0000; The knobs vs mouse click is an operator thing. I personally found knobbed radios to be a hindrance. There are some doing remote contesting without any physical radio near them. N1MM+ does most of my; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00166.html (11,699 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>; Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 08:46:16 -0400; I wonder if anyone from Top Ten SOAB in the CQ WW DX was using Flex radio... Yuri VE3DZ Bill, I just SOLD my 6700 and Maestro and have ZERO regrets. I had the combination for 16 months and the rig wa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00168.html (9,371 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: Martin Monsalvo - LU5DX <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>; Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 12:41:09 -0300; For what I know, none of the recent top 10 SOAB used Flex radios. At least those outside the US. Not sure how SOAB would benefit from Flex radios. Not needed for 2BSIQ. Furthermore, redundancy is goo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00175.html (11,049 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: I4UFH via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 19:27:59 +0200; SO2R with Flex radios is and were quite difficult until few month ago were no band data were available direct from the radio, and u were to live with the windows issues. So even the 6700 is an excell; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00177.html (13,167 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 14:25:52 -0400; They'll tell you to go away. Not their problem. 73, Ken, AB1J In a message dated 2017-05-23 12:23:30 P.M. Coordinated Universal Ti, steve@nr4m.com writes: Ask them (Flex) about how it works with N1MM; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00179.html (8,461 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: Martin Monsalvo - LU5DX <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>; Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 20:33:38 -0300; Hi Fabio, Considering the new rigs are servers I hope the multi client architecture is in place. Even for SO2R. You may want to have a computer and two iPads to take advantage of ergonomics and touch; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00181.html (13,990 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 22:44:56 -0400; I would imagine that the user interface is the biggest difference. It is not clear to me if you have the Elecraft K3 or K3S. I have the latter and even though is a small transceiver and most buttons; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00183.html (9,128 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 00:00:25 -0400; There are very few Flex users who use them on DXpeditions. I suspect there is simply distrust in a radio that is primarily computer based rather than a radio with knobs. Elecraft is a known quantity; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00185.html (10,798 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios (score: 1): Author: Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 07:44:13 -0400; Don't forget that in a well designed station- including the radio- the only interface that matters is the logger. During a contest I rarely even glance at the radio and if adjustments are needed I ca; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00187.html (12,928 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]