Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Ethics\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Ethics\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Ethics (score: 1): Author: Rick Dougherty NQ4I <nq4i@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 07:46:54 -0400; Hi All...this past weekend in WPX SSB, we worked a KB6 2x3 call sign on 15m....the qso took place on Friday evening on 15m...on Saturday I received an email stating that the KB6 station had realized; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00080.html (10,910 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Ethics (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 07:28:03 -0600; Interesting. I would keep the QSO in the log and forward the email to the WPX guys. Removing it from the log mysteriously makes the contact never happen? CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1 W0MU.NET or 67.40.14; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00084.html (9,825 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Ethics (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 06:31:12 -0700; Yes, I've had email from stations worked in a contest and I just ignore it, even if doing so decreases my score. In your example, if the KB6 had removed the QSO from his log but not emailed you, the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00085.html (9,731 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Ethics (score: 1): Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>; Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:41:23 +0000; I would say the 'more ethical' approach would have been for him to leave the contact in the log. After all he did make it, he can't cause it to go away just by taking it out of the log, in fact in th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00093.html (13,002 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Ethics (score: 1): Author: kd4d@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:36:02 +0000 (UTC); Hi Rick: Faced with the NIL penalty, I would, in this case, remove the QSO from my log before submittal. I would include a note to the contest sponsor, with the log information for the deleted QSO, b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00096.html (14,626 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Ethics (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 06:16:38 -0700; Removing a QSO from the log as a result of receiving an email is a rules violation. Ed - W0YK _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00108.html (16,485 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Ethics (score: 1): Author: Rick Dougherty NQ4I <nq4i@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 10:38:00 -0400; Hi Ed...not sure I see what you mean here...the problem has always been post contest massaging of the log...that is not the case here...I have had to make decisions on contact validity numerous times; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00112.html (18,306 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Ethics (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 17:27:57 -0700; Hi, Rick. Perhaps I misunderstood your original post. It says you received an email from a station which informed you he was taking a QSO out of his log and you should do the same. If that is true an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00123.html (18,647 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]