Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+IARU\s+HF\s+Champinship\s+2006\s+Results\s+\-\s+comedy\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] IARU HF Champinship 2006 Results - comedy (score: 1)
Author: Robert Bajuk <s57aw@hamradio.si>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:41:39 +0200
Sorry, but I'm not smart enough and that really passes my comprehension. Can someone betray a secret how can HA stations win most of the QRP and Low Power categories in IARU HF every year with such a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00190.html (7,383 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HF Champinship 2006 Results - comedy (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:21:27 +0200
Why not have a bit more publicity and transparency to allow a better judging of such scores? An internet-based score list can easily inform about the antenna system used (some european VHF-contests i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00200.html (8,124 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HF Champinship 2006 Results - comedy (score: 1)
Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:33:41 -0000
Robert If they cheated then they lost, it's that simple. If they did, they will know, and almost certainly so will you. For a somewhat different reason, laugh and move on. Nobody gets killed or starv
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00201.html (9,012 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HF Champinship 2006 Results - comedy (score: 1)
Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:46:48 -0400
I think there are a number of reasons not to do this. For one, the contest committee is in a much better position to question and adjudicate irregularities. That's why they get the big bucks (sic). O
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00202.html (9,443 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HF Champinship 2006 Results - comedy (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 05:36:15 -0700
We seem to have gotten past this with Log Checking Reports. I remember when people were first getting their LCRs, there was a certain amount of nitpicking and teeth grinding over specific QSOs, and c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00206.html (10,083 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HF Champinship 2006 Results - comedy (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:05:40 -0700
I agree - I have no problem with anyone looking at my logs. And I have many of them here: http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr/blanco/logs/ My long term plan is to have my contest logs, my contest audio recordin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00210.html (8,638 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HF Champinship 2006 Results - comedy (score: 1)
Author: Zoli Pitman HA1AG <ha1ag@hg6n.hu>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:52:57 +0200
It's simple. They are cheating like hell and the contest organizers don't care even when they are warned with details. IARU HF is a perfect example crooked contesters meet lousy organizers. 73, zoli
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00215.html (8,311 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HF Champinship 2006 Results - comedy (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:07:55 +0200
Or as well by the organizers of the EU-sprint and I never heard of complaints and any nitpicking. I guess there won&acute;t be great interest in small logs other than by other fellow submitters of sm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00222.html (8,870 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HF Champinship 2006 Results - comedy (score: 1)
Author: lz4uu@mail.bg
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:51:24 +0300
Hello all, other interesting thing i mentioned last days are EU records in CQWW CW- wonder how HP/LP/QRP AB have almost same multiplier number,respestively 636/632/632...as well,hats off for the winn
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00228.html (8,711 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu