Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+LP\s+SO2R\s+with\s+no\s+filters\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] LP SO2R with no filters? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:53:35 -0300
Has anyone ever done SO2R with no bandpass filters? I am looking to enhance my contesting experience, especially for those Sunday afternoon doldrums or times when condx really stink (no good bands to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00122.html (8,415 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] LP SO2R with no filters? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 06:18:41 -0400
I did this for a couple of years - my main antennas were on a tower about 250 feet from an HF9 vertical. I was running over 1 KW to them, and 100 watts to the HF9. Did no damage - what's that adage a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00126.html (10,740 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] LP SO2R with no filters? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 04:17:28 +0200
I have no problem to do SO2R at 100W without filters. With my second antenna about 100m away and much lower then the main yagis I can do it even in the same band. 73 Peter Has anyone ever done SO2R w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00127.html (9,510 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] LP SO2R with no filters? (score: 1)
Author: halken <halken@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 09:20:49 -0400
Hi Mike - Pete and others have made some good suggestions. SO2R without filters is certainly possible. Many have done it, including myself. You can proceed risk-free with a simple test. Transmit on o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00130.html (13,285 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] LP SO2R with no filters? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 09:28:42 -0700
Sure, but the success rate will depend on the radios, the antennas, and their proximity. Those are very big variables, so the success rate varies a lot. :) If both radios are K3s (which have very low
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00133.html (8,201 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] LP SO2R with no filters? (score: 1)
Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 03:20:33 +0700
My bad story is using a KW into a tribander with an 40m inverted V fed two feet under the tribander. My second receiver in an ICOM IC-730, no filter, using the 40m ant, and tuned to a separate band,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00135.html (12,102 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] LP SO2R with no filters? (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:31:23 -0700
Buy the W2VJN book from Inrad. It will explain everything: http://www.qth.com/inrad/book.htm But in a nutshell, just try it. It sounds like you have both horizontal and vertical antennas, which will
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00138.html (8,337 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] LP SO2R with no filters? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:14:02 -0500
The amount of work a guy may want to put into checking out the setup for isolation is in direct proportion to the cost of getting a potentially expensive RX repaired. My view is that until you have T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00140.html (10,617 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] LP SO2R with no filters? (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 07:49:18 -0500
I'm curious, This conversation has been interesting for sure. But I wonder if the risk of damage has or is being exaggerated some. Reason thinking this is for one thing. What is gonna happen in a lit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00148.html (12,369 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] LP SO2R with no filters? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lott <lottsphoto@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 10:41:28 -0500
I highly recommend a re-read of Jeff AC0C's comments !!!! Frying a rcvr is easier than most think ! iow I have been there and done that, most hard lessons are not easily forgotten :) Buy the INRAD Bo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00151.html (11,919 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] LP SO2R with no filters? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 08:42:01 -0700
All good advice, Jeff. On a county expedition for CQP several years ago, N3ZZ fried the front end of his K3. W2VJN's excellent book is a great reference. 73, Jim K9YC On Tue,6/16/2015 3:14 PM, Jeff A
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00152.html (9,334 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] LP SO2R with no filters? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 16:27:23 -0600
If they were using 1975-vintage radios, with vacuum tube front ends, I'm not surprised there was no damage. And if there was damage, I wonder if the typical, non-contester, Field Day operator would e
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00158.html (12,972 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu