Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+LoTW\s+Usage\s+\-\s+Will\s+you\s+use\s+it\?\?\?\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:53:05 -0400
Dick: Are you speaking for yourself or the ARRL LoTW team using the CQ Contest List for a forum for the League ??? After doing a TEOMA.COM search on your callsign WC1M, I found that " those advising
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00329.html (15,616 bytes)

22. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:52:18 -0400
Darryl: Are you speaking for yourself or the ARRL LoTW team using the CQ Contest List for a forum for the League ??? After doing a TEOMA.COM search on your callsign WA1GON, I found that "The logging
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00330.html (12,958 bytes)

23. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:26:46 -0500
Sounds to me that you have decided that you aren't going to like it no matter what. You even criticize them for going out of their way in trying to help people out. Thanks for letting us know your op
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00331.html (16,222 bytes)

24. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "W. Wright, W5XD" <w5xd@writelog.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 01:36:20 -0000
"poor form"???? I for one am eager to hear about new ideas/products, etc. that affect contesting and I prefer to hear it from the people who know. I cannot imagine what inspired this comment that is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00333.html (10,314 bytes)

25. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:39:47 -0400
Bob: Well, Bob, you're free to consider it any way you want. That said, you're wrong. You said it yourself: it's a *public* list, open to all to express their views. 73, Jeff Maass K8ND -- The world'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00335.html (14,344 bytes)

26. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Hans K0HB" <K-Zero-HB@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 02:46:00 +0100
advisors Why would that be? Personally, I'm HAPPY to get information from the people directly involved! Too often all we get is rumors, third-hand opinions, and other 'filtered' una-Basher jeremiads
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00342.html (9,411 bytes)

27. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Robert McGwier" <rwmcgwier@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 04:10:35 +0100
Ditto. I am glad to have someone with inside information to share with us. When the first messages started coming, I too did a google search and found the same information and then began to actually
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00345.html (11,075 bytes)

28. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:21:17 -0400
Bob, I *was* an advisor to ARRL during the design phase of LoTW, almost two years ago. During that period, I refrained from making public comments about LoTW because I was not an official spokesperso
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00347.html (19,248 bytes)

29. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "ted demopoulos" <kr1g@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:22:55 +0000
Without checking any responses, I'll respond :) Yes, it makes sense. Maybe it'll happen someday, I hope so. But a little progress at a time (and LoTW is a BIG step). Problem is contest logs are not c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00374.html (12,815 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu