At The moment only The stations disqualified know It. Sent from Sony Xperia -- Saulius Zalnerauskas ha scritto -- _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@co
I feel bad for anyone who gets DQ'ed in a contest. That being said I'm 100 percent sure that the CQWW contest committee doesn't take the decision to disqualify someone lightly. Especially if it's som
This is quite interesting. DQ for to be spotted by another stations from the same country???? Really ??? This remember me to the DQed station from Cyprus at CQWWCW. What will be the next ?? Amazing !
I feel bad for anyone who gets DQ'ed in a contest as well if anyone has broken the rules and has been unmasked. if someone did not break the rules, and is accused of having done so, has clear and irr
Jeff, This may sound more awkward than it is intended, but with no disrespect or criticism towards the CQ WW contest committee intended or implied... I would certainly hope that they take a DQ situat
dear Juan if you have 10 minutes go to read what happened to me, the same happened to other Cyprus station on the CQWW CW, same story to other KP4 stations, but the list sould be too long. quo can re
That was one side of the story. DQ for to be spotted by another stations from the same country???? Really ??? This remember me to the DQed station from Cyprus at CQWWCW. What will be the next ?? Amaz
I can't believe people cheat in radio contests. Shame on them. Ops that are fantastic padding logs, power violations too many to mention, remote receivers across the globe, self spotting and on and o
I'm really not sure what to believe. I would hope that ultimately the contest committee is acting in good faith. I have not heard anything from them, hopefully they can issue a public statement to cl
Mikes right: we only have one side of the story, and we may never get, nor ever be entitled to get, the other side. That said, the availability of IP spoofing is not proof of guilt, just as claiming
I think this is at least the 3rd time I can think of that someone who has been disqualified in a CQWW contest that has tried to plead their case on the contest reflector. This isn't the correct forum
I don't really agree with your assessment Jeff. Aren't we all friends here? Why can't I discuss what happened to me with my fellow contesters? Is the contest committee the "Enlightened Ones" that nev
Because I do not want the methods of they way they are finding cheaters exposed so that the cheaters can modify their behavior to beat the checks. Cheating is real it happens far too much and I am wi
I read the book. I thought it was an ok read, but really fell short in explaining the reasoning behind that decision. I suppose it was done that way to protect those involved. Not only to make that d
To me the whole thing seems a bit inconsistent. I've seen rules violations aplenty that were unnoticed, like stations calling for hours out of band, 7125 LSB in ARRL DX there was a top north east sta
The NFL is a business with a very large budget. Barry W2UP On 2/21/2017 18:17, Ria Jairam wrote: To me the whole thing seems a bit inconsistent. I've seen rules violations aplenty that were unnoticed
The only way to known if a detection method is valid is for it to be open for public scrutiny. This why in 2008 José, CT1BOH and I, wrote a full description of a technique we developed to determine
That means precisely ZERO. Money can't buy fairness, and transparency costs absolutely nothing. If someone is disqualified, the evidence and explanation should be clear as to leave no doubt. Otherwis
I think it would be simpler than that .. There should be a high standard for a DQ ..something close to "Guilty Beyond a reasonable doubt." Log padding is easily discernable as UT5UGR found out ..and
We don't know the stories, so who is to say that they are not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, just because they argue they did nothing wrong in a public forum proves nothing. So the KP4XX should ha