Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+VE4\s+and\s+ND\s+in\s+one\s+QSO\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] VE4 and ND in one QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:41:02 -0800
Regarding KE0Z's Soapbox writeup for his /VE4 activity (below), it appears Emerson, Manitoba may be just above Minnesota from what I can tell on Google Earth. So, the $64,000 question is. if KE0Z (or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00219.html (8,980 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] VE4 and ND in one QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Trottman Compound" <superfly@tetonwireless.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:45:31 -0700
I'm all for it. Those were the two I missed. Where do I send my tax deductable donation? Matt-K7BG _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com ht
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00221.html (7,294 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] VE4 and ND in one QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:29:17 -0800
Does sitting on a county line require separate QSOs for each mult in the QSO party? I would imagine so seeing it would be hard for logging software to issue 2 mults in 1 QSO so, if that's the case, t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00223.html (11,390 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] VE4 and ND in one QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard L. King" <k5na@ecpi.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:54:15 +0000
About 20 years ago I regularly worked WA2SPL/1 in Vermont in the 160M contests. The second night of the contest he would always show up as WA2SPL/VE2 in Quebec. I was told he lived on a farm in North
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00224.html (12,871 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] VE4 and ND in one QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:13:32 -0500
Yes, Joe had two antennas. His property was in the US, but some of the land was in Canada. So, I guess if the antenna itself was in Canada -- away ya go. Being directly on the line? That would not wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00237.html (15,671 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu