Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Vicious\s+CQWW\s+Virus\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Vicious CQWW Virus (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce Sawyer" <n6nt@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:38:35 -0700
I recently received email from somebody identified as "DXCC Robot" and containing a very suspicious looking attachment. The actual email address was unreplyable@mail.ru. The message body began as fol
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00000.html (8,763 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Vicious CQWW Virus (score: 1)
Author: "Timo Klimoff" <timo.klimoff@dnainternet.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 22:13:40 +0300
log This looks like Bugbear - virus. (maybe Bugbear.B) The subject of an infected message is taken from random files on an infected computer and the body of an infected message can be empty or it ca
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00003.html (9,532 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Vicious CQWW Virus (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:59:09 -0500 (CDT)
Looks like a worm at work. What happened most likely is that someone received the e-mail you described from the CQ-Contest robot and then got the virus/worm. The worm program picked that e-mail at ra
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00014.html (9,717 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Vicious CQWW Virus (score: 1)
Author: Cleve D Leclair <dleclair@efn.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
If you suspect a virus and your virus checking software does not see it as viral, then either your virus definitions are out of date or it is not viral or lastly, your virus checking program is not s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00016.html (11,385 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Vicious CQWW Virus (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 17:01:13 +0000
Well, normally, I leave this subject alone, but a couple of questions here. 2. And why in the world would anyone think CQ is using a .ru address? That's a Russian address, and 99% probability fake.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00018.html (8,789 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Vicious CQWW Virus (score: 1)
Author: Craig Cook <n7or@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
I was bitng my tongue, as well, but I will add #4. 4. The file is obviously executable. NO file has 2 extensions. Go into your Windows properties and turn OFF the "hide file extensions". I would thin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00019.html (10,495 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Vicious CQWW Virus (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 07:36:05 -0700
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:05:45 -0700 (PDT), Craig Cook <n7or@yahoo.com> wrote: _________________________________________________________ Not so. I create files with two extensions quite often for my ow
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00021.html (8,709 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Vicious CQWW Virus (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:41:30 -0500 (CDT)
Windows allows you to make an appearance of two extensions. A period is an acceptable character in a file name. Actually, only the one after the last period is the effective extension. I often back u
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00022.html (9,096 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Vicious CQWW Virus (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 19:02:04 +0000
Guys, you're arguing about 2 different apples and oranges. ( or something ) Craig is correct. NO file can have more than 1 extension. Bill is correct also. But he is speaking of fileNAMES, not file
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00023.html (8,775 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu