Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\s+CW\s+Signal\s+Quality\s+Concerns\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX CW Signal Quality Concerns (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 23:38:27 -0700
Yup. Great idea for the first time you observe this, and that's exactly what I did for a neighbor during WPX. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00162.html (9,571 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX CW Signal Quality Concerns (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:59:22 -0500
Don't stop there Jim, maybe you could provide a supplemental list that specifically calls out the rigs that are acceptable in this respect.  And perhaps your objective metric that provides the dividi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00166.html (12,596 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX CW Signal Quality Concerns (score: 1)
Author: Claude Du Berger <duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 08:45:25 -0400
One of the guys who had very bad clicks during WPX wrote me to have details, bands and time because he was using two different radio during WPX. I made 3 Q with him and spotted 2 times with comment D
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00167.html (10,661 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX CW Signal Quality Concerns (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 13:12:09 -0700
With what funding? Isn't that the job of our organizations like ARRL and RSGB? So far, you state the FT2K as belonging in the "bad" (replace) category, On the basis of 6 msec being the slowest possib
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00169.html (11,800 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX CW Signal Quality Concerns (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 17:08:00 -0700
Correction from N6KR (designer) -- about 4 msec 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00170.html (10,060 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX CW Signal Quality Concerns (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 22:25:22 -0500
On a related note, if I've done the math right, at 50 wpm, a dit lasts 24 ms, not including the following space.  I can see how 10 ms rise and fall might sound a bit mushy at that speed. 4 ms would p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00171.html (11,771 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX CW Signal Quality Concerns (score: 1)
Author: Björn Ekelund <bjorn@ekelund.nu>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 06:25:18 +0200
I think the fact that Elecraft can use around 4ms and get a crisp, yet completely click-free, keying unfortunately means that the other manufacturers simply haven't bothered. Although Elecraft would
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00172.html (12,318 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX CW Signal Quality Concerns (score: 1)
Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:05:30 +0200
Isn´t it also so that in the K3 the CW signal is also routed through a filter to limit the bandwith ? 73 Jim -- Den 2020-06-09 kl. 02:08, skrev Jim Brown: On 6/8/2020 1:12 PM, Jim Brown wrote: They a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00173.html (10,542 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX CW Signal Quality Concerns (score: 1)
Author: Barry W2UP <w2up.co@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:26:11 -0600
I've had QSOs at 80 WPM with some guys having very sharp keying. I've never noticed clicks on any of them. Off hand, don't know what radios they use. Barry W2UP ______________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00175.html (12,126 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX CW Signal Quality Concerns (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 09:59:12 -0400
Just a decade ago, CW contest signals with extreme power supply ripple (causing large sidebands +/-100, +/-300, +/-500 Hz but also out a longer ways to kHz in worst cases) were extremely common from
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00176.html (8,828 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX CW Signal Quality Concerns (score: 1)
Author: Ed W0YK <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 07:32:37 -0700
There are few, if any, K3 radios running pre-2013 firmware that added FSK waveshaping.  The radio has always had AFSK filtering.  Both types of K3 RTTY transmission are among the cleanest signals on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00177.html (9,653 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX CW Signal Quality Concerns (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 11:38:52 -0700
Yes. Although Elecraft would like us to think of it as a secret sauce, there is *no magic* to minimizing the bandwidth of on-off keying using envelope shaping. Any electrical engineer with a college
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00178.html (13,339 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu