- 1. [ct-user] WA2MOE (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Wruble" <ai7b@teleport.com (Bob Wruble)
- Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 18:09:08 -0700
- This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_003D_01BDAF52.7F011B80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable not sure u did urself a
- /archives//html/CT-User/1998-07/msg00023.html (18,210 bytes)
- 2. [ct-user] CT-9 and Icom 706 (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Wruble" <ai7b@teleport.com (Bob Wruble)
- Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 08:57:10 -0700
- the soluting to poor support and a superior product is TR SW by n6tr...... w7gg -- To: <ct-user@contesting.com> -- Submissions: ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@ve7tcp
- /archives//html/CT-User/1997-06/msg00008.html (9,656 bytes)
- 3. [ct-user] CT .vs. TR (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Wruble" <ai7b@teleport.com (Bob Wruble)
- Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 17:02:11 -0700
- i too was a devoted ct user from the first time it was available as is/was most of the now devoted 2-3000 TR users.......somewhere along the way ken wolf, k1ea seemed to lose interest in the k1ea/CT
- /archives//html/CT-User/1997-06/msg00013.html (9,788 bytes)
- 4. [ct-user] CT <> TR <> others (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Wruble" <ai7b@teleport.com (Bob Wruble)
- Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 21:08:34 -0700
- wat u say is true....i have been using tr for general qso logging just to stay familiar with all the features especially on cw........seems to help a lot and then i dwn .dat file to my permanent log
- /archives//html/CT-User/1997-06/msg00018.html (9,525 bytes)
- 5. [ct-user] CT <> TR <> others (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Wruble" <ai7b@teleport.com (Bob Wruble)
- Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 21:19:42 -0700
- when i first switched from ct to tr i kinda thot the same until i began to realize wat tree ( a world class contester) was trying to do in terms improving operating efficiency etc........probably bes
- /archives//html/CT-User/1997-06/msg00019.html (8,965 bytes)
- 6. [ct-user] CT, or not CT? That is the question! (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Wruble <ai7b@teleport.com> (Bob Wruble)
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 14:29:15 -0700
- if u think ct has features and functionality wait till u get uptp speed on tr!! good move de w7gg -- To: <ct-user@contesting.com> -- Submissions: ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org Administrative requests: ct-u
- /archives//html/CT-User/1997-06/msg00063.html (10,014 bytes)
- 7. [ct-user] CT, or not CT? That is the question! (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Wruble <ai7b@teleport.com> (Bob Wruble)
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 23:39:39 -0700
- if ur gonna change ...go fer the best!! tr that is the learning curve is well worth it !! de w7gg.... -- To: <ct-user@contesting.com> -- Submissions: ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org Administrative requests:
- /archives//html/CT-User/1997-06/msg00065.html (8,116 bytes)
- 8. [ct-user] Crash goes CT 9.26 (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Wruble" <ai7b@teleport.com (Bob Wruble)
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 1997 17:15:10 -0700
- you guys oughta switch over to TR and rid urselves of most of these CT probs !!!!!! -- To: <ct-user@contesting.com> -- Submissions: ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@ve
- /archives//html/CT-User/1997-04/msg00005.html (7,743 bytes)
- 9. BUG IN 9.26 ...: IS CT BBS YET ON ?? (score: 1)
- Author: Ai7b@teleport.com (Ai7b@teleport.com)
- Date: Mon, 6 May 1996 14:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
- -- Submissions: ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@ve7tcp.ampr.org WWW: http://www.ve7tcp.ampr.org/Software/ct Questions: owner-ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org
- /archives//html/CT-User/1996-05/msg00006.html (6,707 bytes)
- 10. CT support (score: 1)
- Author: Ai7b@teleport.com (Ai7b@teleport.com)
- Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 15:08:28 -0700 (PDT)
- ct support contiues to suck....you need to switch to n6tr sw....better product and surely better supported!! -- Submissions: ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@ve7tcp.am
- /archives//html/CT-User/1996-05/msg00021.html (6,580 bytes)
- 11. RES file wrapup and solution (score: 1)
- Author: Ai7b@teleport.com (Ai7b@teleport.com)
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 1995 03:09:24 -0800
- ` TO BAD CT IS SO POORLY SUPPORTED THESE DAYS....EVERY VER HAS BUGS! WHICH SEEMS UNREASONABLE FOR A NATIONALY ADVERTISED AND SOLD PRODUCT! -- Submissions: ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org Administrative reque
- /archives//html/CT-User/1995-12/msg00024.html (6,849 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu