Mail Archive Search: <+from:k4oj@tampabay.rr.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:k4oj@tampabay.rr.com: 67 ]

Total 67 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] Hola, gang (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ); Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 23:11:49 -0500; on behalf of computer contest loggers everywhere...thanks, Ken! Leave him alone guys, he deserves a break from the hoards of unappreciative hams who actually think that somehow ken makes money on thi; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-12/msg00079.html (7,205 bytes)
2. [ct-user] ARRL 10m Contest Sections (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (k4oj); Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:44:45 -0500; ... I believe that window is just looking (in this contest) for info for your summary sheet - I would opt for "DX" - which you truly will be! 73, have a blast... Jim, K4OJ; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-11/msg00094.html (8,971 bytes)
3. [ct-user] ARRL 10m Contest Sections (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (k4oj); Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 13:30:10 -0500; ..I think that if you look at the summary sheet for your operation (or the header in Cabrillo file) you will see "Section: __" as an assist to the ARRL people in putting your log into the right group; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-11/msg00097.html (11,081 bytes)
4. [ct-user] Release 9.82 (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ); Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 12:07:18 -0500; Tae Pit Ken, It is hard for me to imagine even turning on the rig without using computer logging... I appreciate your pioneering, and continued support of, computer assisted contesting - thanks to yo; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-11/msg00149.html (8,425 bytes)
5. [ct-user] CT9.81 - CQWW M2 Category (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ); Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 15:03:56 -0400; I am confused (so what else is new) If you have more than two stations and want to do the new M2 category how does the computer know which the third 3rd position becomes (1 or 0) when it goes live. F; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-10/msg00006.html (9,256 bytes)
6. [ct-user] CT9.81 - CQWW M2 Category (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ); Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 23:28:15 -0400; ...thanks, Bob I think I get it. K4OvenJunkie; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-10/msg00008.html (12,936 bytes)
7. [ct-user] help (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White); Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 23:16:44 -0400; I have picked up some smaller pentium units which seem to work great - they respond to the xcvr changing frequency, etc. than the 486es do... They are pretty much so free now - keep your eyes and ear; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-09/msg00009.html (12,098 bytes)
8. [ct-user] old FT990 (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ); Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 22:35:01 -0400; baud rate must be 4800 hope that helped - I use 990 with CT and no problems as long as I say 4800 for the rate 73, Jim, K4OJ; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-09/msg00013.html (7,460 bytes)
9. [ct-user] M2 Logging in CQWW (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ); Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 17:56:43 -0400; does it flag QSOs from one radio/position versus another - is it another column in the Cabrillo output? Ken?? K4OJ; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-09/msg00022.html (8,286 bytes)
10. [ct-user] Wish LIST (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White); Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 07:42:23 -0400; careful - you are dating yourself! if the software is automatically assigning a time to a QSO, I think the point is why not make it a more accurate one...since it is a question of changing the progra; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-07/msg00023.html (10,666 bytes)
11. [ct-user] Wish LIST (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White); Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:18:08 -0400; talk about fast! whoa K4OJ seconds. qso's; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-07/msg00025.html (8,597 bytes)
12. [ct-user] Field Day Options entry (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White); Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 21:51:33 -0400; ....you will be hearing that nomenclature in the exchanges you log this weekend - like those VE3's who always have something like 25A transmitter category! 5. Exchange: Stations in ARRL / RAC section; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-06/msg00027.html (10,566 bytes)
13. [ct-user] Icom 706 CW interface (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White); Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 21:35:34 -0400; seem to remember seeing a similar post long ago - think solution was changing resistor values in the interface...but at my age it is all a little blurred! K4OJ; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-06/msg00036.html (8,158 bytes)
14. [ct-user] WPX MS Problem (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White); Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 21:22:53 -0400; mebbe that is your anticipated QSO total - being it is you and John 'BAI, eight...maybe as you work people it will decrement....at the end on Sunday you should have nothing left to work! naw.... K4OJ; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-05/msg00025.html (7,329 bytes)
15. [ct-user] NEQP Rover Question (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White); Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 21:15:05 -0400; Dunno if this helps but: for the FQP we havwe seperate logs for each county when you exit a county you reboot the next log K4OJ travel station an regular me; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-04/msg00028.html (8,440 bytes)
16. [ct-user] FT1000D - NOT (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ); Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:45:25 -0800; I am having trouble getting CT to communicate with the FT1000D...only part of the band info seems to make the trip back and forth into the CT network... If I tell CT that it is an FT990 that is hooke; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-02/msg00025.html (7,056 bytes)
17. [ct-user] Back to orig freq...how? (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ); Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:57:46 -0800; after using the arrow to get over into the band map for a needed mult what is the command to return the rig to the previous "run" frequency? 73, Jim, K4OJ Have you put something back into contesting?; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-02/msg00028.html (7,551 bytes)
18. [ct-user] ONE RADIO (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ); Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:27:26 -0800; I agree, Carl - why such a fuss... Seems like a lot of noise over a very minor problem....and I question whether or not it even deserves to be labeled a problem...let alone spending the energy to mak; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-02/msg00047.html (10,636 bytes)
19. [ct-user] CW, CT and the FT1000MP (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ); Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 12:05:20 -0800; I have yet to find a keying or networking problem that is not cured on of these three (or a combination thereof) add ferrite close to the "smart" box - if there are two "smart" boxes a ferrite close; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-02/msg00059.html (14,637 bytes)
20. [ct-user] Band "pre-set" in CT V9 (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ); Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 21:43:05 -0800; alt-F1 or alt-F2 Jim, K4OJ; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-02/msg00070.html (10,958 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]