Good day, all: I have decided to try to get CT's ethernet network working on my fairly new laptop. I have it dual booting Windows XP and DOS and that works great. The nettsr program requires a DOS pa
Have you considered ctwin instead? It runs in windows, uses the built in windows networking, and in a laptop the limitation of no dvp support won't matter. David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@ar
Hi David: Actually, no, I hadn't seriously considered that. Simply didn't occur to me. How stable is it these days? :-) DVP support obviously doesn't matter on newer hardware, we'll use external voic
Hi Mark. I have been using CTWin for contesting from here at home for several years. The LPT port keying seems excellent to me. Running XP-Home on a Dell 2.8 MHz P4. However, at N3RS, we are relegate
How about com port cw keying too so we can use current generation computers to key cw from ctwin..hint hint. 73,Rick K3OO Hi Mark. I have been using CTWin for contesting from here at home for several
I guess I'm a dummie. What kind of computer are you referring to that doesn't have a parallel port? MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm How about com port cw keying too s
Based on our experience at W2BC this past weekend, I'd say CTWin still has some limitations that make CT-DOS preferable: 1. No DVP capability. (I like not having to speak at all when operating phone
Bud, Ethernet linking and telnet access in CTWin is really easy to use and the operation is bug-free. For #3, I have only ever seen a delay in sending with CTWin, never stuttering or missed character