Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Paddle\s+input\-\s+Why\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Paddle\s+input\-\s+Why\?\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] Paddle input- Why? (score: 1): Author: alsopb <alsopb@gloryroad.net> (alsopb); Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 16:13:46 +0000; I'll plead ignorance this issue. Why does the CT program have to have paddle input? Can't a separate keyer in parallel with the key jack perform the same function? Are some people out there entering; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-06/msg00011.html (8,596 bytes)
2. [ct-user] Paddle input- Why? (score: 1): Author: Bill Fisher W4AN <w4an@contesting.com> (Bill Fisher W4AN); Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:17:54 -0400 (EDT); 1) It is something else on the desktop to wire up that doesn't have to be there. 2) It is NEVER the same speed as CT. 3) You can use your paddles to break CT keying. 4) You don't know what you've bee; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-06/msg00012.html (9,819 bytes)
3. [ct-user] Paddle input- Why? (score: 1): Author: Dave Sublette <k4to@meginc.com> (Dave Sublette); Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 13:33:16 -0400; I use a keying cable from DX Solutions, Huntsville, AL, which has a parallel female quarter inch jack for an input from an external keyer. I use the external keyer a lot during repeats...etc. It shou; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-06/msg00016.html (9,896 bytes)
4. [ct-user] Paddle input- Why? (score: 1): Author: alsopb <alsopb@gloryroad.net> (alsopb); Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 17:34:41 +0000; Doesn't the paddle have to be there? As I said, my keyer and paddle occupy the same footprint. The keyer input wires are 4" long. Wiring it up is two wires (key lead and ground to the rig) vs three l; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-06/msg00018.html (10,837 bytes)
5. [ct-user] Paddle input- Why? (score: 1): Author: Hans K0HB" <K0HB@qwest.net (Hans K0HB); Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 20:53:55 +0100; Actually that is the precise reason I have a separate keyer in parallel with CT. I run CT keying fairly QRQ, and the "outside keyer" about 5-6WPM slower to answer the slower calls I get. If someone c; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-06/msg00019.html (8,529 bytes)
6. [ct-user] Paddle input- Why? (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt" <n6ig@hotmail.com (Jim Pratt); Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 21:25:38 -0000; One thing what would be a terrific feature of an internal CT-keyer would be the ability to, upon hitting the paddle, immediately interrupt what is being sent from the CT memory. That can't easily be; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-06/msg00020.html (9,047 bytes)
7. [ct-user] Paddle input- Why? (score: 1): Author: George Fremin III - K5TR <geoiii@kkn.net> (George Fremin III - K5TR); Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 14:40:05 -0700; Really? CT is the same as TR-Log for CW, PTT and Paddle. http://www.k1ea.com/lpt.htm As far as I know NA uses the same pins. -- George Fremin III Johnson City, Texas "Experiment trumps theory." K5TR; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-06/msg00021.html (9,043 bytes)
8. [ct-user] Paddle input- Why? (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> (Bill Tippett); Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 22:05:35 +0100; Here is a reason I would like a separate keyer. Maybe it is due to my aging 486-33, but when the log begins to get fairly large, the SAVELOG function interrupts everything for several seconds (~10 se; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-06/msg00022.html (8,722 bytes)
9. [ct-user] Paddle input- Why? (score: 1): Author: Ken Wolff" <kwolff@ultranet.com (Ken Wolff); Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 18:48:28 -0400; How do NA and TR differ? - Ken --Original Message-- From: owner-ct-user@contesting.com [mailto:owner-ct-user@contesting.com] On Behalf Of George Fremin III - K5TR Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 5:40 PM; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-06/msg00023.html (9,606 bytes)
10. [ct-user] Paddle input- Why? (score: 1): Author: Don Melcher" <don@hfradio.com (Don Melcher); Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 16:45:00 -0700; Well - I JUST received a W1WEF keying interface from Radioware in the mail (I was lazy and didn't feel like building one - yes - I know how easy it is!) and it works fine with CT for the CW key and t; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-06/msg00024.html (10,378 bytes)
11. [ct-user] Paddle input- Why? (score: 1): Author: wb6tza@socal.rr.com (wb6tza@socal.rr.com); Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 17:38:27 -0700; An interesting point, Bill.. However.... with the general reliability of hard disks, it seems to me that a manual savelog when YOU want it is the best way to handle the matter... we did that on all t; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-06/msg00025.html (11,594 bytes)
12. [ct-user] Paddle input- Why? (score: 1): Author: Jim Brannigan <jbrannig@optonline.net> (Jim Brannigan); Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 20:40:00 -0400; I second this thought, I use a keyer with a "y" cable in parallel with CT, for fills Jim -- WWW: http://www.k1ea.com/ Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@cont; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-06/msg00026.html (9,839 bytes)
13. [ct-user] Paddle input- Why? (score: 1): Author: Bill Hider" <n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider); Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 01:29:16 +0100; I have a P-III 1000MHz and AUTOSAVE takes just as long as it did with a 386-33. It's the floppy drive, not the processor. Bill, N3RR seconds least, -- WWW: http://www.k1ea.com/ Submissions: ct-user@c; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-06/msg00027.html (9,084 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]