Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+SS\s+\+\s+9\.46\.002\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] SS + 9.46.002 (score: 1)
Author: N2NU@aol.com (N2NU@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 09:07:48 EST
Used CT this weekend 2 computers/2 radios - anyone else out there have problems with sequence numbers in multi computer setup? My symptom was that CT occasionally wanted to send the same number (the
/archives//html/CT-User/1999-11/msg00069.html (7,579 bytes)

2. [ct-user] SS + 9.46.002 (score: 1)
Author: Dallas Carter <ludal@dmv.com> (Dallas Carter)
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 09:46:13 -0500
Yes, It was a terrible problem. Another one was that once a call was entered, the number was locked in, and if erased, the number was set. If that radio did't make a QSO for some period, the number s
/archives//html/CT-User/1999-11/msg00070.html (8,856 bytes)

3. [ct-user] SS + 9.46.002 (score: 1)
Author: Robert S Morris" <rsmorris@worldnet.att.net (Robert S Morris)
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 15:20:45 -0500
Had the same problem here with a short trial at 2 radio 2 band 2 computer operation in the 15M position.. Only way I saw to get the number unlocked was to turn that computer off and back on again.. H
/archives//html/CT-User/1999-11/msg00071.html (10,367 bytes)

4. [ct-user] SS + 9.46.002 (score: 1)
Author: Doug Brandon <dab@home.com> (Doug Brandon)
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 1999 10:54:31 -0800
I do single op 2 radio, but I haven't gotten around to checking out the 2-radio software support, so I just use two computers networked together. I used 9.45 this weekend, but remember seeing this w
/archives//html/CT-User/1999-11/msg00075.html (8,573 bytes)

5. [ct-user] SS + 9.46.002 (score: 1)
Author: Dallas Carter <ludal@dmv.com> (Dallas Carter)
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 19:16:36 -0500
Yes the bin file is hosed too, also the ASCII log files. 73 Dallas W3PP I do single op 2 radio, but I haven't gotten around to checking out the 2-radio software support, so I just use two computers n
/archives//html/CT-User/1999-11/msg00082.html (8,938 bytes)

6. [ct-user] SS + 9.46.002 (score: 1)
Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@berkshire.net> (David Robbins)
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 1999 20:42:16 -0500
this is a common problem with networked ct for ss and other contests where serial numbers are shared across bands. you must work in exactly the right sequence or the numbers get out of sync. i think
/archives//html/CT-User/1999-11/msg00083.html (10,795 bytes)

7. [ct-user] SS + 9.46.002 (score: 1)
Author: Dallas Carter <ludal@dmv.com> (Dallas Carter)
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 06:47:21 -0500
Yes Dave, that is one solution, but you cant log the qso till you receive the exchange. If one op has to wait for the transmitter and the other logs before he does, they both send the same number. It
/archives//html/CT-User/1999-11/msg00089.html (7,992 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu