Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:bhrbek@jagwireless.net: 222 ]

Total 222 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 08:27:19 -0600
Whoa....wait a minute..... You are telling me that I can now "upgrade" at the "upgrade" pricing, my COR/ROR units? I don't have to purchase the entire license? -bob
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00006.html (15,192 bytes)

2. Re: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 09:22:52 -0600
That is awesome. I've got about 5 COR's that I'd like to get to 4.31 or so. I'm having some latency issues with the second wireless interface and I've heard that the newer FW fixes it? thanks, Bob --
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00008.html (18,469 bytes)

3. Re: [Karlnet] KN200 Problems (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:14:49 -0600
ouch, that sucks. I have a similar situation with a backup link. I have an AP-1000 with 1 Orinoco card that services the local area and the secondary card is a backup to the 5.8ghz trango radio I hav
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00012.html (10,863 bytes)

4. [Karlnet] AP-1000 loses one radio interface (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 15:56:21 -0600
Anybody else have AP-1000's that ocassionally lose a radio interface and require a reboot to restore it? This is really getting old! grr.. (it's an orinoco COR 4.15, so I'm sure there could be a prob
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00023.html (7,867 bytes)

5. Re: [Karlnet] Speaking of Demarc (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 09:14:10 -0600
get the Engenius cards from Eje they work great. what
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00033.html (9,492 bytes)

6. Re: [Karlnet] VPN ? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:36:47 -0600
It will work fine on an outgoing vpn. It might not work so well on an incoming. If you want to test, I'll give the IP of a vpn server. I use Mikrotik and Cisco routers. The Mikrotik's do the NAT and
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00042.html (8,311 bytes)

7. Re: [Karlnet] routing and bridging (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 11:39:59 -0500
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00009.html (8,762 bytes)

8. Re: [Karlnet] Some details about the Blackbird card (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 22:37:13 -0500
found 30mW.
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00039.html (9,337 bytes)

9. Re: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:11:56 -0500
waverider over Alvarion? why are you going to 900 ....it is sooo expensive. Do you think you are getting the additional penetration necessary to make it worthwhile? them
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00060.html (13,069 bytes)

10. Re: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:22:35 -0500
I suppose they come with a "selectable output voltage" PS? maybe a label like this is on them?:
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00067.html (18,510 bytes)

11. Re: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:23:31 -0500
It's all the communication that Karlnet does....it just got lost...I'm sure. ;)
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00068.html (15,978 bytes)

12. Re: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 13:04:16 -0500
I'll 2nd that. Spending money....shipping both ways (when the unit doesn't work) and my time to test something that is broken off the bat IS VERY FRUSTRATING!@
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00090.html (27,615 bytes)

13. Re: [Karlnet] 802.11a and SE-4505 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:33:03 -0500
cardbus it's been a standard for a while. Try to stick an 802.11a card in a RG-1000 the slots on the side of the card do not line up. It differentiates one standard from another.
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00133.html (13,179 bytes)

14. Re: [Karlnet] 802.11a and SE-4505 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:47:41 -0500
I believe it is a issue of the design specs of the slot being 5v for cardbus vs. 3.3v for pcmcia. There are probably some other issues as well but it is equal to the technology advances in hard drive
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00135.html (16,169 bytes)

15. Re: [Karlnet] wispcon snap shots anybody ? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 17:43:21 -0600
nobody from Karlnet will have any pics....they'd rather not show up at things like that I guess....you know, go to the important conventions....the wisps don't matter. Heck, even Trango showed up and
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00188.html (9,883 bytes)

16. Re: [Karlnet] wispcon snap shots anybody ? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 17:56:28 -0600
I thought the turnout was good. Typical of the conference...I think it was around 350-400 There were quite a few vendors and it was nice to really get to talk about their products in a one-on-one and
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00190.html (10,039 bytes)

17. Re: [Karlnet] wispcon snap shots anybody ? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 18:14:41 -0600
Trango 900Mhz coming in December Canopy, lower pricing on larger volumes, 2.4Ghz product by December Not much else. Anything new and super exciting that we should all be aware of? I thought the turno
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00192.html (11,113 bytes)

18. Re: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:26:14 -0600
I see high latency between the vendors implementations. ....in the range of 3 - 130ms.
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00206.html (10,330 bytes)

19. [Karlnet] Strange ping loss (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 08:43:36 -0500
I have an Orinoco COR v4.15 with about 14 RG-1000 clients and 1 AP-1000 that is serving as a POP and backhaul for the small pop. In all, about 35 clients are going through this AP, in on way or anoth
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00036.html (9,024 bytes)

20. Re: [Karlnet] Strange ping loss (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:29:16 -0500
many of my RG clients are using the new 4.41 fw. I wonder if that is the cause? Can I downgrade these? this on to is Satellite/Base. for errors constantly, times. I
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00038.html (12,211 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu