Mail Archive Search: <+from:cj@cpvegas.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:cj@cpvegas.com: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:00:28 -0800; i have a network with about 150 client nodes running karlnet 3.88, 4.43 and v.44. About once a month the clients become zombies and will only come back up with a hard reboot(power cycle) of the CPE e; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00179.html (8,277 bytes)
2. [Karlnet] Changing Polarity (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 12:23:57 -0700; I am going to change a radio from vertical to horizontal polarity. The problem is there is 35 clients off the antenna. What would be the best way to do this to minimize downtime? I don't mind it bein; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00654.html (7,360 bytes)
3. [Karlnet] Changing Polarity (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 14:12:09 -0700; Thats not a bad idea. the only concern is will it cause too much interference to do anything? I cant change the channel because i'm already using 6 and 11 up on the roof top. if i change thepolarity; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00658.html (8,215 bytes)
4. [Karlnet] RE: New repeater WIPOP has bad ping/jitter. (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:47:49 -0700; I've been having that problem for a while now. It seems to be when the load goes over 1.5-2mb on the base station. I havent been able to solve this problem at all and i have assumed its because i hav; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00692.html (7,509 bytes)
5. [Karlnet] karlnet COR (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:44:10 -0700; Bob, i notice in your post that you mention: 1) Version of Karlnet (if it's an old version the FW version on the radio cards matters) a question for you. What version of firmware should this be? the; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00740.html (7,085 bytes)
6. [Karlnet] Changing Polarity (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:45:40 -0700; just thought you might want to know, changing polarity made a huge difference. Went from -65(amped) noise floor to -74(amped) and have good signals throughout the network. I'm sure the antenna had so; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00753.html (7,636 bytes)
7. [Karlnet] Karlnet] ap-1000 overloaded? (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 11:34:39 -0700; what is the max amount of users to reasonably put on an AP-1000? it seems every time i approach 40, the unit ping times to clients starts to slow down. it is the newer AP-1000, not the one with the B; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-05/msg00231.html (7,023 bytes)
8. [Karlnet] Any way to see traffic being passed? (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 15:59:58 -0700; Is there any way to see the amount each turbocell station entry is passing in bytes for like a 30 second average or anything? I know i can see the total number of packets, but it would be nice to see; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-05/msg00280.html (6,828 bytes)
9. [Karlnet] AP LOCK up/ won't pass ip traffic but link test works (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:51:10 -0700; This is happening to me as well. it has been happening for a quite a while on anything that seems to have a high noise floor and a lot of clients connected. I've been just re-doing our network as muc; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-07/msg00079.html (7,151 bytes)
10. [Karlnet] Versions (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 12:27:09 -0700; Banda, can you go into more detail about this please? i think it might be the problem i am experiencing. My network still has like 30 RG-1000s running 3.88 version on them, and like once every 5 minu; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-08/msg00007.html (7,117 bytes)
11. [Karlnet] Versions (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 15:31:47 -0700; ya, i've done everything i can think of to track down this problem. i've sat there with a sniffer, used packet generators to see if i could simulate it, messed with every clients transmit rate depend; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-08/msg00010.html (7,895 bytes)
12. [Karlnet] Versions (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 16:10:00 -0700; sorry if i sent this twice, i think i sent it from a non-functioning mail server though, Dan, what do you mean? sniffing the packets as they go by in ethereal? Viewing the statistics in the configura; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-08/msg00012.html (7,409 bytes)
13. [Karlnet] Versions (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 22:47:04 -0700; i'm just doing a normal ping -t in windows( 32 bytes). i open up 6 or so screens to ping different rg-1000s and they all go up at the same time. the main problem is that this wreaks havoc on vpns and; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-08/msg00017.html (8,144 bytes)
14. [Karlnet] Versions (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:00:39 -0700; thanks banda i'm quite familiar with the turbocell protocol, i've read just about everything on the web with the term karlnet in it with hopes to resolve my issue and just so ya know, version 3 has p; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-08/msg00021.html (8,578 bytes)
15. [Karlnet] transitioning to canopy (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 19:34:05 -0700; this isnt specifically a karlnet question, but i'm hoping someone can provide some insight. I have a question about people that have transitioned over to canopy networks from karlnet. I have a bridge; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-10/msg00029.html (7,865 bytes)
16. [Karlnet] transitioning to canopy (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 19:59:08 -0700; ya, within the SM, the forwarding of traffic within the SM between its LAN port and wireless(rf, wan) port just stops. the customer can ping their side of the SM and i can ping the rf port. within th; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-10/msg00031.html (7,630 bytes)
17. [Karlnet] transitioning to canopy (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 23:21:44 -0700; i thought it was the arp cache too. i have made sure every switch/router i have that the timeout is 300 seconds everywhere. i have also checked the canopy and made those 30 minutes(max is canopy) fro; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-10/msg00033.html (7,241 bytes)
18. [Karlnet] Terabeam-WISP list response (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:58:40 -0800; When is 4.46 gonna be released? i've heard it promised to be released for months now. _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-11/msg00101.html (8,057 bytes)
19. [Karlnet] 4.46 released (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:14:30 -0800; I saw the 4.46 kernel was relased recently when i logged into my license-it account. how is it working for people especially with the ip freeze issue? any reactions? thanks cj _______________________; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-12/msg00002.html (6,440 bytes)
20. [Karlnet] warpusers.py (score: 1): Author: "cj" <cj@cpvegas.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:05:24 -0800; Does anyone have the sample python scripts for warp from karlnet? i was finally able to secure all the documentation on it, but cannot find the scripts. can someone send them or tell me where to get; /archives//html/Karlnet/2005-02/msg00021.html (6,868 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]