Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:steve@texasbb.com: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [Karlnet] Strange ping loss (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:20:35 -0500
For whatever it's worth, I just found a NAT problem. This will only apply if you're running NAT on the device that is locking up. Some clients behind the NAT AP were running something that was genera
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00040.html (12,391 bytes)

2. RE: [Karlnet] Strange ping loss (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:07:11 -0500
That is wise. None of ours NAT, but at an apartment complex we made an outdoor FlashROM as a satellite station (works great as far as the elements are concerned) and received a wireless backhaul whic
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00042.html (15,251 bytes)

3. RE: [Karlnet] snmp (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:15:09 -0500
Try Solarwinds if you're trying to track snmp stats. The engineers package comes with a lot of helpful tools, and can even send alerts for downs, packet loss, high bandwidth usage, etc... It is very
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00118.html (9,364 bytes)

4. [Karlnet] Outdoor FlashROM ??? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 13:32:26 -0500
I wanted to inquire about who'd be interested (if anybody) in an outdoor FlashROM unit. I know the unit will be subject to extreme heat (which we will be testing in Texas) and we have all expressed c
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-08/msg00005.html (8,793 bytes)

5. [Karlnet] Outdoor FlashROM ??? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 13:32:54 -0500
I wanted to inquire about who'd be interested (if anybody) in an outdoor FlashROM unit. I know the unit will be subject to extreme heat (which we will be testing in Texas) and we have all expressed c
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-08/msg00006.html (8,793 bytes)

6. RE: [Karlnet] Outdoor FlashROM ??? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:09:41 -0500
It's hard to nail down a price as we may have to change something, but I think it should be around $2500. Steve Deaton IT Director Texas Broadband, Inc. (888)868.3835 ext 85 (office) 979.289.0148 (of
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-08/msg00041.html (10,494 bytes)

7. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:24:15 -0500
First let me say that this does not apply to those WISP's who only see a maximum of 20 or 30 residential clients on a single AP. In some tiny towns, the cheap solution is the best way to go. For the
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00126.html (13,135 bytes)

8. [Karlnet] Re: Flashrom Unit, anyone know who made this (score: 1)
Author: "steve" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 00:02:43 -0400
karlnet used to make firewalls before wireless equip, if I remember correctly. Maybe the seller does know what he has. Brett Hays writes: I ran across this unit on eBay today. Obviously, the seller d
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00174.html (8,271 bytes)

9. RE: [Karlnet] Need a FlashROM base (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 09:02:51 -0500
several reasons. One is because they do not manufacture them. Another reason is that they do not want to support them. We manufacture FlashROM units and will warranty them against hardware defects.
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00180.html (8,442 bytes)

10. RE: [Karlnet] Is this interference? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:18:20 -0500
We have had similar problems with polling. We have many commercial accounts that run citrix, or streaming audio/video, etc... With polling enabled, whoever needs the largest bandwidth seemed to get i
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-06/msg00031.html (12,834 bytes)

11. RE: [Karlnet] Is this interference? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:26:35 -0500
Dan's Bandwidth management comment: We throttle every client at their location with the RG-1100. It is not bandwidth related because even someone trying to view an IP camera at low frame-rate and res
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-06/msg00037.html (18,665 bytes)

12. RE: [Karlnet] best approach for a WISP start-up (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:47:04 -0500
Looking at the figures listed below that totaled just over $2800, I'd use a FlashROM. It'll bring your total up to the full $4k, but be a heck of a lot better as well as able to handle expansion late
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-06/msg00124.html (9,064 bytes)

13. [Karlnet] Ratified 802.11G (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 17:43:20 -0500
Anyone know if this is true? I heard it was ratified. Anyone know if Karlnet plans to support the cards & increased bandwidth? I know I am aiming high as 100mW & 200mW cards are not officially suppor
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-06/msg00127.html (7,287 bytes)

14. RE: [Karlnet] First install of Ubicom-based CPE... (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:38:44 -0500
Regarding the signal, has anyone ever seen different signal results from the RG-1100 than from the AP? I have several clients that show good from the AP, but have packet loss when you connect to the
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-06/msg00152.html (11,990 bytes)

15. RE: [Karlnet] First install of Ubicom-based CPE... (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:46:20 -0500
I changed some of our APs to ISP mode to try out the new board. The board is working fine at my house, and I seem to have a better throughput, which is an interesting side effect. Confirmed that sign
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-06/msg00153.html (14,316 bytes)

16. RE: [Karlnet] RG-1000's that CONSTANTLY lockup (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 12:11:58 -0500
I have RGs that have been up for 7 months w/out problem. Of course, I am using TC, not 802.11, and I don't know which you have in play. I'd determine the problem with the RGs and fix it. The only "re
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-05/msg00005.html (13,694 bytes)

17. RE: [Karlnet] Ethernet Port failures (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 17:54:49 -0500
We've over 200 RG-1100's in the field and have only seen two such circumstances. Hope this helps. Steve Deaton IT Director Texas Broadband, Inc. (888)868.3835 ext 85 (office) 979.289.0148 (office) 97
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-05/msg00152.html (8,787 bytes)

18. [Karlnet] 100mw or 200mW & WEP (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 13:51:54 -0500
Has anyone tried using 100mW or 200mW cards with WEP enabled? I can only get 64-bit to work. I have tried the three different versions of firmware on the demarc website, but with no luck. I am using
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00035.html (7,518 bytes)

19. RE: [Karlnet] 100mw or 200mW & WEP (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 17:46:42 -0500
TONY: So when you say you know they work, do you mean with 128-bit wep??? I can't seem to get the 128-bit wep to work. Steve Deaton IT Director Texas Broadband, Inc. (888)868.3835 ext 85 (office) 979
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00037.html (9,693 bytes)

20. [Karlnet] Turbocell Signal (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:40:01 -0500
Anyone ever try to check signal and see nothing for any of the values? Sometimes I'll check signal on a client (first open the AP list) and see nothing. All my clients are showing up, and I can ping
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00040.html (8,281 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu