Jim Save the cfg to a zip file and send it to me I will take a quick look at it. Sincerely Tony Morella Demarc Technology Group Office: 908-996-7995 Cell: 908-246-9170 Fax: 908-847-0202 email: tony@d
FYI The NEW 100mW cards we have are based on the Prism 2.5 chipset just like the 200mW card (which we will have very soon!). While we have not be able to reproduce the reboot problem in house with th
Send me a zipped cfg file I will take a look. Sounds like a routing is not setup correctly. Sincerely Tony Morella Demarc Technology Group Office: 908-996-7995 Cell: 908-246-9170 Fax: 908-847-0202 em
This is by far the best subnet calculator I have used ands it free :) http://www.wildpackets.com/products/ipsubnetcalculator Sincerely Tony Morella Demarc Technology Group Office: 908-996-7995 Cell:
Dan Your last note got me thinking all our test where with version 4.02, hmm will see what I can do about getting a 3.88 unit setup for testing. Sincerely Tony Morella Demarc Technology Group Office:
Jim This is correct it seems to be how KN is reading the numbers from the card and how its reported. From our in house tests all the links seem to be solid using the Prism 2.0 chipset just not report
Nate To be fair the Prism 2.0 cards do work in the flashrom units but from what we have seen only one can be installed at a time, this is a problem with the TC code and not the cards. Sincerely Tony
Bill The cards do work with TC but the reporting info is not 100% again this is how TC communicates with the cards, the cards themselves work great. And when not being using with TC do report the cor
Nate Correct this is what we have observed. Also, note the 200mW card you have is based on Prism 2.5 chipset as is the our newer 100mW card. In the test we have been running the jumping readings has
Nate Well I wouldn't say fault, just possible bug :) Software is every evolving, I am very eager to see how things operate with the new version once its out. I am very interested in your feed back. F
Bill To be clear the cards themselves outside of Karlnet have been work great with no problems, many of the cards are being used in standard 801.11b mode. Also from talking to customers, many not on
Dan Yes this looks like what we have seen. But if you look at the other side of the link, with a lucent card, did the power signal go up? If should have about 4-5dBm. Sincerely Tony Morella Demarc Te
Dan can you confirm by how much? Sincerely Tony Morella Demarc Technology Group Office: 908-996-7995 Cell: 908-246-9170 Fax: 908-847-0202 email: tony@demarctech.com http://www.demarctech.com Wireless
Ok here's an confirmed update. At this time all Prism 2.0 and 2.5 cards do not report noise level. So when looking at the readings the only valid one is the signal level. I have requested a change to
That is about right. Sincerely Tony Morella Demarc Technology Group Office: 908-996-7995 Cell: 908-246-9170 Fax: 908-847-0202 email: tony@demarctech.com http://www.demarctech.com Wireless Solution Pr
Larry Your request is for SEC which is not an option under the prism cards, SEC only works for Orinoco cards. Sincerely Tony Morella Demarc Technology Group Office: 908-996-7995 Cell: 908-246-9170 Fa
Larry This is correct at this time, I have not received a update on whether or not SEC will be supported on the Prism chip. Doug any comments on this?? Sincerely Tony Morella Demarc Technology Group
Norm This is correct, I believe Doug posted this is other day. TC does not report noise level as the firmware on all Prism cards do not report it yet. From what I have been told the card can do it if
Norm The noise readings are a firmware issue on the Prism as it does not report this info to KN. What are the test you have run checking the signal levels? Replacing an Orinoco with a Prism on the Cl