Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dave.bernstein@comcast.net: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [RFI] BPL Protest Opportunity? Give up? NO! (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 22:02:47 -0400
Has the ARRL joined forces with the purveyors of 3G Cellular (UMTS, WCDMA, etc) and WiMax (802.16) to emphasize the superiority of these solutions to the "last mile" problem in comparison to BPL? Its
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00128.html (14,479 bytes)

2. RE: [RFI] More Thoughts on BPL (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 13:17:56 -0400
If you can design a modem that will make it possible for Farmer John to download porn at 5Mbps through a sewer pipe then I am sure you will be lauded as a hero. Broadband Nirvana will have been achi
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00162.html (14,514 bytes)

3. RE: [RFI] BPL on NPR (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 16:11:57 -0400
WiMax and 3G cellular (UMTS, etc) are better solutions for rural connectivity than satellites. And we don't need to subsidize their development; Intel, Verizon, Motorola, Ericcson, Microsoft, Nokia,
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00174.html (11,014 bytes)

4. RE: [RFI] Broadband over Power Line (BPL) radio interference (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 16:20:12 -0400
Yes, like many anti-BPL arguments, most of the same points were mentioned -- but with different rationale and emphasis. If I say "you can't have cheap broadband access because I want to be able to ch
/archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00021.html (12,785 bytes)

5. RE: [RFI] Broadband over Power Line (BPL) radio interference (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 16:56:49 -0400
This nation is governed by laws and regulations. The way we maintain a reasonably civil society and avoid anarchy is through a set of laws and punishments for failure to adhere to the law. You may n
/archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00023.html (15,841 bytes)

6. RE: [RFI] RE: Broadband over Power Line (BPL) radio interference (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:44:46 -0400
Unfortunately, your analogy does not survive close inspection. There is no way to compensate for the loss of a species; if you lose access to HF, however, you can chat with your VK friends using voic
/archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00028.html (9,492 bytes)

7. RE: [RFI] Broadband over Power Line (BPL) radio interference (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:22:35 -0400
Re "There are a few of us working this issue within ARRL, but hundreds of thousands of amateurs out there. Guess which group can get the most done!" 1. where would I find a list of all active and pla
/archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00030.html (11,592 bytes)

8. RE: [RFI] RE: Broadband over Power Line (BPL) radio interference (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:55:27 -0400
You cannot purchase extinct species at the store. Their cell lines, their DNA, the unique enzymes they may have produced -- all are irreversibly unavailable. I agree with your characterization of spe
/archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00032.html (10,467 bytes)

9. RE: [RFI] Broadband over Power Line (BPL) radio interference (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:30:17 -0400
The purpose of my posts has been to argue for more effective action against BPL. That should have been apparent to you from the first. Your rationale for not seeking out BPL pilots, publicizing their
/archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00033.html (17,806 bytes)

10. RE: [RFI] Broadband over Power Line (BPL) radio interference (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:34:56 -0400
If you've arranged for local hams to cover every active and imminently active BPL pilot, then my criticism was indeed incorrect. Is there a similar effort aimed at hams working for public service age
/archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00042.html (14,425 bytes)

11. RE: [RFI] Broadband over Power Line (BPL) radio interference (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:50:38 -0400
Since, as you say, the locations of BPL trials are not secrets, then the risk of yahoo behavior is present either way. Being more open about the "local coordinator" strategy might actually reduce the
/archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00045.html (12,993 bytes)

12. RE: [RFI] Broadband over Power Line (BPL) radio interference (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 21:09:55 -0400
Thanks, Tom. Are the frequencies in use likely to be compromised by BPL? Every public safety or law enforcement agencies rely on wireless communications, but most of this is VHF and above, which as I
/archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00052.html (11,599 bytes)

13. RE: [RFI] This'd help in some areas (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:47:01 -0400
That makes sense, Jim. We could then correlate low-band usage with BPL pilot locations. If there are matches, then we know where to focus our efforts. If there are no matches, this fact would substan
/archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00065.html (8,594 bytes)

14. RE: [RFI] Why we badly need "party line" materials for all hams (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:37:42 -0400
My comments are aimed at improving our chances of prevailing over BPL; they do not target individuals. We cannot hamstring ourselves for fear of offending those who've been leading the fight. Hopeful
/archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00103.html (10,341 bytes)

15. RE: [RFI] Why we badly need "party line" materials for all hams (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:47:18 -0400
I disagree, Ed. Senior management can create a single integrated team tasked with winning this war. Educating the ham community, and providing them with continuously up-to-date information would be a
/archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00115.html (36,699 bytes)

16. RE: [RFI] Canal water! (& BPL) (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:52:32 -0400
I have been a member of the ARRL since the day I received my novice ticket in 1990. There is nothing in my postings that can be construed as ARRL bashing, unless you're among those who consider const
/archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00116.html (9,774 bytes)

17. RE: [RFI] Canal water! (& BPL) (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 17:40:57 -0400
I did not say 'no one within ARRL should be allowed to say that something is someone else's job', I suggested the creation of an organization responsible for winning the BPL war and then said 'No one
/archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00128.html (12,510 bytes)

18. RE: [RFI] Canal water! (& BPL) (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:08:49 -0400
The direct response is "assemble a team that is capable of executing the mission". This approach removes organizational barriers and their attendant complexity; it does not add another layer of compl
/archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00136.html (16,393 bytes)

19. RE: [RFI] turnabout is fair play?? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:34:28 -0400
The power being distributed is DC, so the 60hz DXers can rest easy. Disturbances near the graves of both Edison and Tesla have been noted... Which brings to mind an entirely different solution to BPL
/archives//html/RFI/2004-08/msg00007.html (9,051 bytes)

20. RE: [RFI] From Communications Daily re: BPL (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:07:43 -0400
The PLCA doesn't give the ARRL much credit for focusing on the BPL-generated RFI issues and staying quiet about BPL's poor economics. "This has become like an unmitigated war that ARRL has declared o
/archives//html/RFI/2004-08/msg00077.html (13,902 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu