Mail Archive Search: <+from:n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:n6kj.kelly@gmail.com: 114 ]

Total 114 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [RFI] Grow Lights (score: 1): Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 17:37:38 -0800; I've heard two distinct noises from grow lights. The first has a very distinctive 120hz buzz. It starts with random pops. The pops get closer and closer together until an hour or so later the buzz is; /archives//html/RFI/2011-01/msg00013.html (9,873 bytes)
102. Re: [RFI] A wish (score: 1): Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 07:25:31 -0800; Well that is what I was told bit if it's not true then I will stop spreading that rumor. Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http:/; /archives//html/RFI/2011-01/msg00019.html (7,218 bytes)
103. Re: [RFI] Grow Lights (score: 1): Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 08:04:18 -0800; "medical" marijuana is legal in California and anyone can get a prescription. There are places around here that use techniques you describe but others look the other way. Sent from my iPhone ________; /archives//html/RFI/2011-01/msg00035.html (11,445 bytes)
104. Re: [RFI] Grow Lights (score: 1): Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 09:26:44 -0800; Who do you think will be the first person in the neighborhood suspected of turning in the grow op? How about the ham with the big tower? When I first put up my tower several neighbors called the city; /archives//html/RFI/2011-01/msg00037.html (11,554 bytes)
105. [RFI] Palmdale Antenna Zoning Case rejected by CA Supreme Court? (score: 1): Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:01:38 -0700; What do you make of this, Fred? This appears to be pretty ominous. http://www.arrl.org/news/view/california-supreme-court-declines-to-hear-antenna-zoning-case ________________________________________; /archives//html/RFI/2011-04/msg00045.html (6,718 bytes)
106. [RFI] RFI to new photoelectric smoke detector (score: 1): Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 19:23:25 -0800; My inlaws just bought us a couple of new photoelectric smoke+fire detectors. They are both 9v battery powered First Alert model SA710CN. They are sensitive to RFI when I run 1KW. I did not have RFI w; /archives//html/RFI/2012-11/msg00014.html (7,010 bytes)
107. Re: [RFI] RFI to new photoelectric smoke detector (score: 1): Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:44:30 -0800; I tried multiple bands and multiple beam headings today, in addition to trying 80m. I couldn't make the smoke detector "chirp" today. I have no idea why. I assume it won't happen again until the next; /archives//html/RFI/2012-11/msg00016.html (10,605 bytes)
108. Re: [RFI] RFI to new photoelectric smoke detector (score: 1): Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 21:28:36 -0800; Nothing was different AFAIK. The only difference I can think of is that I removed the battery (during the contest) and put it back in today. Oh well. It will probably come back at which point I can d; /archives//html/RFI/2012-11/msg00018.html (8,436 bytes)
109. [RFI] Solar System RFI (score: 1): Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 08:58:22 -0700; I believe I have identified a new source of RFI in my neighborhood. It appears to be coming from the solar system installed last year by my next door neighbor. Noise is about S7 on all bands during d; /archives//html/RFI/2013-03/msg00127.html (7,254 bytes)
110. Re: [RFI] Samsung isn't completely RF quiet (score: 1): Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:47:48 -0700; Hams are a small minority. Samsung wouldn't even notice. I only buy my electronics from brick-and-mortar stores with good return policies, so I can return them if they generate RFI. I think do a thor; /archives//html/RFI/2013-09/msg00052.html (8,778 bytes)
111. Re: [RFI] LED Bulbs (score: 1): Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:54:43 -0800; Exactly. Why should I be forced to be the bad guy that forces my neighbor to fix an RFI problem that could have been prevented by manufacturers? At the very least, the FCC should require manufacturer; /archives//html/RFI/2014-02/msg00083.html (16,430 bytes)
112. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:20:30 -0700; I understand why the FCC doesn't want to force every device to meet such strict standards that it can't possibly cause harmful interference. What I don't understand is why the FCC isn't willing/able; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00088.html (12,642 bytes)
113. [RFI] Looking for low-RFI high efficiency lighting (score: 1): Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 22:20:46 -0700; I am looking for high efficiency lighting (CFL/LED) for a new kitchen, but I don't want an increase in RFI as a result. Building codes now require at least 50% of the wattage in the kitchen to be fro; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00005.html (7,371 bytes)
114. [RFI] Non-RF sensitive hardwired smoke/fire alarms? (score: 1): Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 20:25:21 -0700; I would also be interested to hear about others' experience with hardwired smoke/fire/CO2 detectors. Building codes now require new construction to have hardwired/interconnected smoke detectors. I re; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00014.html (8,460 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 114
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]