Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w8ji@contesting.com: 254 ]

Total 254 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [RFI] Quiet Shack PC Systems? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 04:58:20 -0500
Deni, Every cable and wire in my shack, including power lines, enter through a bulk-head feedthrough plate. All of my cable shield connections are good. All of my antenna are at least a few hundered
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00066.html (7,452 bytes)

62. Re: [RFI] Quiet Shack PC Systems? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:45:58 -0500
Unless I'm not following something, I don't know why that would be true. I don't isolate or choke the ground leads outside equipment and would never do that. I bond the safety ground of all power ma
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00125.html (11,322 bytes)

63. [RFI] BPL (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 08:21:46 -0500
I worry a bit that we are obtaining a "chicken little" reputation with the FCC and the media because of poor management or planning of our responses. I think we did not plan our strategy very well fr
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00137.html (9,563 bytes)

64. Re: [RFI] Quiet Shack PC Systems? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:32:36 -0500
I have zero problems with RF in the shack because my antennas are fed correctly and are a reasonable distance away. RF in the shack does not come from bad shack grounds, it comes from poor antenna f
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00147.html (11,579 bytes)

65. Re: [RFI] BPL (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:37:04 -0500
financial That is exactly right!! It is a poor investment because there are better cheaper methods to provide broadband service, and because it causes disruption of MANY services. Ham Radio is way d
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00148.html (8,405 bytes)

66. Re: [RFI] RFI From Hell (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:36:44 -0500
More than likely it is a switching supply of some type. The "off in the heavy rain" could just be a happenstance. I've only had one power line conducted emission problem here in the country and it wa
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00169.html (7,718 bytes)

67. Re: [RFI] WSJ-BPL (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:32:59 -0500
That's the problem with mass complaints. A large number of complaints don't mean nearly as much as one communication on a topic. I'd guess that most complaints aren't very accurate or well written.
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00177.html (7,596 bytes)

68. Re: [RFI] 120v halogen lights (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 10:04:14 -0400
the 24 and search I have some LV "puck lights" in my shack and had to throw away the "transformers" because of RFI and use real LV transformers. _______________________________________________ RFI m
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00011.html (8,162 bytes)

69. Re: [RFI] 120v halogen lights (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 10:23:22 -0400
That's right, as long as it is AC. If you run DC bulb life is shorter. 73 Tom _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00013.html (7,626 bytes)

70. Re: [RFI] BPL a major topic at Upcoming UTC Annual Meeting (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 07:36:25 -0400
If the purpose is to disrupt communications it is called intentional or malicious interference. If the interference is incidental to legal use of a legally and properly operated licensed service and
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00055.html (9,631 bytes)

71. Re: [RFI] BPL (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 13:04:58 -0400
Not that what we are doing isn't good, but it lacks a direct connection to the safety of people. I've been trying to promote or encourage demonstrations and complaints involving other services. The
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00064.html (7,889 bytes)

72. Re: [RFI] BPL (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 18:11:04 -0400
Doc, I know your intentions were good, but we have to be careful what we preach least it come back to haunt us. Some of the worse intentional interference problems I have dealt with have been "legal
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00077.html (8,046 bytes)

73. Re: [RFI] Wasted and Useful Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 12:07:27 -0400
come out of auto ridiculous spoilers on thought they made the This should remind us of WHY people think what we do is totally unimportant. It is a very good example of how people on the outside look
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00016.html (9,358 bytes)

74. Re: [RFI] Wasted and Useful Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 12:56:41 -0400
like me can't 1.) The method of splaying main bearing bolts for improved crankshaft main bearing life. The factories used to just add additional bolts or cross-bolt and make the bearing caps and bol
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00017.html (10,392 bytes)

75. Re: [RFI] Wasted and Useful Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 13:37:29 -0400
that forward What are you going to do when the keying transients ignite the hydrogen? _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00030.html (8,886 bytes)

76. Re: [RFI] BPL Protest Opportunity? & BC-AM Ant Improvement? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 09:27:34 -0400
Why don't we go back to talking about RFI, instead of trying to figure out which liar and crook is the most honorable and generous? Things will continue to deteriorate no matter who gets elected, be
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00044.html (9,398 bytes)

77. [RFI] Fw: "homeplug" activity to establish PowerLine communicationfor Home use (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 10:45:04 -0400
Here we go again!!! operators, when I after the working in the communication of multimedia at home.... make radio reception ARRL/FCC to run a distribution strategy. in Europe favour to any other home
/archives//html/RFI/2004-06/msg00016.html (8,314 bytes)

78. Re: [RFI] CAT 3 Cable? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <W8JI@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 20:38:38 -0400
CAT Virtually all the time the problem is common mode excitation, and the type of wire changes that very little if at all. As for beads, people just throw a few beads at the problem and assume they
/archives//html/RFI/2004-06/msg00054.html (8,970 bytes)

79. Re: [RFI] CAT 3 Cable? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <W8JI@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 04:44:59 -0400
octaves. I actuallysuspect most people with any background understand how multiple turns through a bead are better. The problem is applying the devices, not the "surprising" revelation N^2 often wor
/archives//html/RFI/2004-06/msg00059.html (10,330 bytes)

80. Re: [RFI] CAT 3 Cable? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:30:20 -0400
CAT 5 route and together at the service drop. What you actually did was make a crude low-pass filter. This illustrates my point perfectly! Using ONLY a series impedance is not a very wise thing to d
/archives//html/RFI/2004-06/msg00065.html (9,138 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
This search system is powered by Namazu