Mail Archive Search: <+from:wa2bpe@infoblvd.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:wa2bpe@infoblvd.net: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] RSGB EMC Guide 'problem" (score: 1): Author: wa2bpe@infoblvd.net (WA2BPE); Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 18:17:59 -0500; Folks, Is there anyone out there who could copy (or scan) and send me one page of "The RSGB Guide to EMC"? I obtained a new copy a year ago and just found that one page has a printing error resulting; /archives//html/RFI/2003-01/msg00007.html (6,686 bytes)
2. [RFI] EMI/RFI Bibliography (score: 1): Author: wa2bpe@infoblvd.net (WA2BPE); Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:03:53 -0500; ...just found this bibliography of information that may be new to some on this reflector. I am sure there is more additional info (since 1998), but still could be useful and pertinent to many, especi; /archives//html/RFI/2003-01/msg00031.html (6,694 bytes)
3. [RFI] "Jason Hissong" RFI not street lights (score: 1): Author: wa2bpe@infoblvd.net (WA2BPE); Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:08:31 -0500; A scanner won't work if it is FM only; you need AM detection. Tom - WA2BPE; /archives//html/RFI/2003-01/msg00032.html (10,028 bytes)
4. [RFI] EMI/RFI Bibliography (score: 1): Author: wa2bpe@infoblvd.net (WA2BPE); Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:20:35 -0500; oops - forgot to include the url - sri. http://lists.contesting.com/_rfi/1998-January/000013.html; /archives//html/RFI/2003-01/msg00033.html (7,272 bytes)
5. [RFI] Subwoofer does CW (score: 1): Author: wa2bpe@infoblvd.net (WA2BPE); Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:38:10 -0500; They do indeed have their own active amps with rather husky power supplies to deliver the high peak currents required. The growth of the multiple speaker/component systems and the tangle of associate; /archives//html/RFI/2002-11/msg00037.html (7,616 bytes)
6. [RFI] Computer RFI problem (score: 1): Author: wa2bpe@infoblvd.net (WA2BPE); Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 15:22:38 -0400; Folks, FWIW, just got back from local Staples store. There *is* a rebate of **$70** on the 710e (and $50 on other"selected" models) but: 1. you may have to ask for the rebate slip - none were "in sig; /archives//html/RFI/2002-08/msg00014.html (9,848 bytes)
7. [RFI] Noise gone but don't know why (score: 1): Author: wa2bpe@infoblvd.net (WA2BPE); Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 00:30:30 -0400; Maybe you got "lucky" - for the moment. Sometimes they will clear themselves but it usually doesn't last unless a hot tap welded itself shut. Problems are almost always hardware related and with 7-15; /archives//html/RFI/2002-07/msg00003.html (11,383 bytes)
8. [RFI] Broad band Cable Modem (score: 1): Author: wa2bpe@infoblvd.net (WA2BPE); Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2002 18:17:09 -0400; Check the cable setup carefully despite what the cable company says it has done. Another local who does a lot of monitoring of various services found many bad connections + he was experiencing tremen; /archives//html/RFI/2002-06/msg00005.html (9,044 bytes)
9. Re: [RFI] LCD Monitors (score: 1): Author: WA2BPE <wa2bpe@infoblvd.net>; Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 14:51:56 -0400; Replaced a dying CRT monitor here with a 15" Samsung 150S (~$260 at "Sam's Club") - all monitor EMI garbage in shack appears gone and not one bad/missing pixel. If some is spotted in the future, deta; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00161.html (7,847 bytes)
10. Re: [RFI] Line noise (score: 1): Author: WA2BPE <wa2bpe@infoblvd.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 15:43:31 -0500; The updated version (ISBN 0-9653760-2-8) is excellent and well worth the $25 investment. I share info like this with a NYSEG troubleshooter I work with (and have found problems that eluded him) inval; /archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00036.html (7,376 bytes)
11. Re: [RFI] 345kv transmission lines (score: 1): Author: WA2BPE <wa2bpe@infoblvd.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:51:52 -0500; 345KV - wet wx = corona; dry wx = hardware - but most bad hardware goes poof at these voltages so it has to be fixed. Most lines of this voltage not bad when dry - I have a 250+KV line 2 miles away -; /archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00066.html (7,915 bytes)
12. Re: [RFI] BPL posts (score: 1): Author: WA2BPE <wa2bpe@infoblvd.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:22:03 -0500; John - IMO, this topic is of such vital importance, it needs to be published here and many other places too - not all subscribe to this reflector. Some will (always) complain but those folks are bury; /archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00140.html (7,976 bytes)
13. Re: [RFI] BPL article on msn (score: 1): Author: WA2BPE <wa2bpe@infoblvd.net>; Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 11:23:32 -0500; The staff writer didn't do her homework; she appears to have just cloned a press release. The closest approach to any problems with the technique is a (brief) reference to "...working out kinks and a; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00001.html (7,453 bytes)
14. Re: [RFI] Quiet Shack PC Systems? (score: 1): Author: WA2BPE <wa2bpe@infoblvd.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:56:14 -0500; It doesn't (all) specifically apply to laptops, but here goes anyways.... It is essential that the PC itself be "bottled up" - make sure all the case edges are really in contact. In this regard, I bu; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00075.html (9,848 bytes)
15. Re: [RFI] BPL obsolete (score: 1): Author: WA2BPE <wa2bpe@infoblvd.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 13:46:28 -0400; In this respect you are 110% correct - and the politicians (in the short term) will (may?) look like heroes. In the town I grew up, a mayor of many years back kept taxes low - artificially low, by no; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00033.html (13,483 bytes)
16. Re: [RFI] PLCA Response to WSJ Article (score: 1): Author: WA2BPE <wa2bpe@infoblvd.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:00:15 -0400; Take it from one who worked in industry (R&D) for 40+ years; big spending does not, by definition, assure or imply success. IMO, if they really spent this much, it was $ spent on bad science What I w; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00038.html (12,022 bytes)
17. Re: [RFI] Investment vs. interference: BPL (score: 1): Author: WA2BPE <wa2bpe@infoblvd.net>; Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 15:25:55 -0400; As I understand it, DSL is still limited to 18000 ft. from the "central office" - but determining exactly where that is isn't always obvious. If I am wrong here, I would like to know it. I also just; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00069.html (8,669 bytes)
18. Re: [RFI] Powerline NOISE -- no radio! (score: 1): Author: WA2BPE <wa2bpe@infoblvd.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 14:14:30 -0400; 15% reduction sure not much considering that hearing is logarithmic. Sounds like they have a hum-dinger of a problem! Oops - sorry! :-) Looks like they decided to see what they could get away with. D; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00085.html (7,897 bytes)
19. Re: [RFI] Lawsuit (score: 1): Author: WA2BPE <wa2bpe@infoblvd.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:03:02 -0400; What bothers me is that there are so many HAMs who refuse to support the ARRL because all policies aren't to their liking. Ed Hare shared with me a while back that a vote of the Directors on ?? topic; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00105.html (9,499 bytes)
20. Re: [RFI] strange double-buzz interference (score: 1): Author: WA2BPE <wa2bpe@infoblvd.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:29:15 -0400; Did not listen (yet) but every 1-2 seconds - sounds like possibly an electric fence. Tom - WA2BPE _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.cont; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00110.html (7,886 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]