Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+WSJ\-BPL\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+WSJ\-BPL\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] WSJ-BPL (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:11:53 -0000; all: I spoke with Ken Brown, the reporter who wrote the WSJ piece, yesterday. Although he works in the WSJ's technology section, he freely admits he's not technical. He also pointed out that he hadn'; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00176.html (7,202 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] WSJ-BPL (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:32:59 -0500; That's the problem with mass complaints. A large number of complaints don't mean nearly as much as one communication on a topic. I'd guess that most complaints aren't very accurate or well written.; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00177.html (7,596 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] WSJ-BPL (score: 1): Author: Alex <kr1st@amsat.org>; Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:25:00 -0500; While I do agree with what you say, fact is that if there were no mass complaints, it wouldn't be front page news. If only the ARRL and 6 (pick a number) other hams would have filed a thoughtful resp; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00178.html (7,487 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] WSJ-BPL (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 20:16:31 -0800; see everything for this very reason. Aside from the added range that might be possible from "hot" BPL equipment, 2.4 and 5.8 GHz WI-FI systems (including home wireless LANs) have the same problem, b; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00181.html (7,826 bytes)
5. RE: [RFI] WSJ-BPL (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:02:22 -0000; I think Mike's on-point with his view of BPL. The reality is that they're hoping that interference TO and FROM transient services will be sufficiently brief that they won't have to deal with it. They; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00182.html (8,428 bytes)
6. Re: [RFI] WSJ-BPL (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jimbrown.enteract@rcn.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:52:25 -0600; This is a a common problem with the popular press. Their people are competent ONLY as "writers" and as reporters of events that their education has made them competent to understand. Few, if any, are; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00183.html (8,843 bytes)
7. Re: [RFI] WSJ-BPL (score: 1): Author: Mike Coslo <mcoslo@adelphia.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:01:13 -0500; Jim Brown wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:11:53 -0000, Jim Jarvis wrote: I spoke with Ken Brown, the reporter who wrote the WSJ piece, yesterday. Although he works in the WSJ's technology section, he f; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00184.html (10,954 bytes)
8. Re: [RFI] WSJ-BPL (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jimbrown.enteract@rcn.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:54:54 -0600; You know the wrong engineers for this sort of assignment. (or maybe the limitation is in your head). I'm one of the "right" kind. I'm an engineer, and I make my living by communicating technical conc; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00185.html (9,851 bytes)
9. Re: [RFI] WSJ-BPL (score: 1): Author: "Dennis Berry" <dennisberry@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 23:07:37 -0500; You know, I didn't read from his original comments that he was trying to pigeon hole anyone? But, I'm just a dumb ole engineer who can't carry a tune in a bucket, nor did I get a minor in liberal art; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00186.html (10,930 bytes)
10. Re: [RFI] WSJ-BPL (score: 1): Author: Mike Coslo <mcoslo@adelphia.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 22:34:01 -0500; Jim Brown wrote: You know the wrong engineers for this sort of assignment. (or maybe the limitation is in your head). Jim, You are too sensitive. I'm one of the "right" kind. I'm an engineer, and I m; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00001.html (10,106 bytes)
11. Re: [RFI] WSJ-BPL (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jimbrown.enteract@rcn.com>; Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 22:51:09 -0600; No insult taken or intended, Mike. But I have seen far too many companies who pigeonhole their engineers into the narrow boxes you describe. When they do, they hurt their companies by preventing comm; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00002.html (7,274 bytes)
12. RE: [RFI] WSJ-BPL (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 08:33:25 -0600; Here's another take on the subject of pigeon-holing of engineers. Most, if not all ethical codes for professional engineers require that engineers put society & the public good above that of his comp; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00003.html (8,689 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]